Answer:
B. Low-level employees engaging in stock fraud
Explanation:
A: The reason A is an incorrect option is because the question specifically refers to employees of the company. Meaning that interference by outsiders does not count as embezzlement.
C: This option is incorrect because this option involves company owners, which does not refer to low-level employees, and therefore is incorrect.
D: Also does not refer to low-level employees due to the referencing to upper-level management.
Can you show me a picture of your work, or maybe use brainly’s quick answers
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>C. I dislike driving on a road that has a lot of curves.
</em>
<em />
<u>Explanation:</u>
A relative clause is one sort of ward condition with a subject and action word, yet cannot remain solitary as a sentence. It is now and then called an adjective clause since it capacities like a modifier it gives more data about a thing. A relative statement consistently starts with a "relative pronoun," which substitutes for an idea, a thing, expression, or a pronoun when sentences are joined.
Restrictive relative conditions give information that characterizes the thing—data that is essential for the complete ID of the situation. Use "that" or "which" for non-human things; use "that" or "who" for human traits.
Answer:
his expirience in jail, as shown it was not a warm welcoming
