To write how the conditions of your community environments can trigger different responses and build an argument for or against positivist theories, it is necessary to carry out more in-depth research on the topic to generate a more consistent argument.
<h3>Positivist theories</h3>
This philosophical perspective defends the idea that some knowledge considered positive is based on the experience of natural phenomena and their relationships. That is, it is based on interpretation by reason and logic to determine true knowledge.
Therefore, to build your case for or against positivist theories that suggest that people may have specific traits that influence how they respond to their social environment, it is essential to utilize critical thinking and draw on their community and needs to form your argument.
Find out more information about Positivist theories here:
brainly.com/question/8698221
Answer:
One who engages in categorical moral thinking is likely to approach the trolley car case by focusing on:
e) Whether diverting the trolley car would violate people's rights.
Explanation:
Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) proposed that a person should always respect the humanity in others and that the person should only act in accordance with rules that could hold for everyone. For example, he claimed that people have a duty to do the right thing even if that action produces a bad result. Thus, telling a lie in order to save a friend from jail is considered to be morally reprehensible by Kantism. For Kant, therefore, a person is doing something good if they are taking a morally right action.
Answer:
first off no one can trust them and people soon believe that this certain person is not fit for any reliability so the person will be pushed away
Explanation:
Answer: c
Explanation: I took a test on it
