Answer:
A discriminating monopoly is a single entity that charges different prices—typically, those that are not associated with the cost to provide the product or service—for its products or services for different consumers. Non-discriminating monopolies, on the other hand, do not engage in such a practice.
It is a <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.
<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>
Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:
<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>
See the link below for more about Arbitration:
brainly.com/question/1139969
The right answer is keep social exchanges proactive and with intent.
What are Social exchanges ?
- Social exchange Proposition proposes that social behavior is the result of an exchange process.
- The reason for this exchange is to increase benefits and less costs.
- According to this proposition, people weigh the implicit benefits and pitfalls of their social connections. When the pitfalls overweigh the prices, they will terminate or abandon the relationship.
Most connections are made up of a certain quantum of give- and- take, but this doesn't mean that they're always equal.
Social exchange suggests that it's the valuing of the benefits and costs of each relationship that determine whether or not we choose to continue a social association.
Melina manages a platoon that's all remote. She wants to unite with her platoon to design and make a culture when working. So the suggestion to her and her team is to keep social exchanges proactive and with intent.
Learn more about Social exchanges here:
brainly.com/question/5660582
#SPJ4
Answer and Explanation:
The answer is attached below
Answer:
Realized gain $110,000
Recognized gain $110,000
Explanation:
The computation of the Tonya's realized and recognized gain is shown below:
Amount realized by Tonya (fair market value) $560,000
Less; Amount given by Tonya
Yacht: adjusted basis ($250000)
Assumption of Nancy's mortgage ($200000)
Realized gain $110,000
Recognized gain $110,000
