Answer:
Identifying only two options and ignoring others.
Explanation:
This seems like it is the right answer.
Answer:
<em>Substantial evidence must show that had the new evidence (which relates to the prior determination) been considered at the time of the prior decision, the claim would not have been allowed or continued.</em>
Explanation:
It clarifies the first part should be you answer here. i say this because one needs to clarify what is trying to be said.
It might be personification
