I hope I answered your question correctly.
In my opinion I don't think that it was wrongful interference, only because if that was me I did what I was told to do. If anything it would be the assistance fault.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Workplace Technology focues on maximizing effency to increase profit margines
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Gross domestic product (GDP) deflator determines the prices of all the good and services produced within the nation whereas consumer price index (CPI) calculates the price of goods and services that are bought by the consumers.
GDP deflator only includes the goods and services that are produced domestically which means that it doesn't include imported goods but in case of CPI, it includes the price of all the imported goods that are bought by the consumers.
Therefore, above are the reasons why CPI is better than GDP deflator at indicating the prices of the goods and services that are bought by the consumers of a nation.
This is known as a (D) manufacturing patent.
<h3>
What is a manufacturing patent?</h3>
- Manufacturing patents are patents that pertain to manufacturing methods, which are also known as utility patents or, in some situations, design patents.
- When you create a new product or procedure, patenting it is only the first step.
- A patent is an exclusive right granted by the United States government to an inventor in the United States.
- For a limited time, the inventor may use, sell, license, or produce the invention.
- It is essentially the bestowal of a privilege or right.
- The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is the branch of the United States government in charge of patent issuance.
Therefore, this is known as a (D) manufacturing patent.
Know more about patents here:
brainly.com/question/14287035
#SPJ4
The correct answer is given below:
Valentino patented a new and unique manufacturing process that his corporation used. This is known as a
(A) plant patent.
(B) design patent.
(C) utility patent.
(D) manufacturing patent.
Below are the pros and cons of the current highway funding structure as related to taxes paid by motor<span> carriers:
Cons:
1. There is solid restriction to fuel charges increase.
2. The present government transportation financing structure depends essentially on tax collection of oil driven vehicles; this, nonetheless, is not reasonable in the long haul because of the real worry on environmental change.
2. The clients of the current aberrant client charge framework which depends on tax assessment of the devoured fuel are uninformed of the sum they pay as fuel charges.
Pros
1. Engine fuel charges yield heaps of income with less effect on the fuel costs.
2. The financing structure of expressways has added to the monetary development and thriving of the na±on, this will con±nue into the future if the assets are well spent.
3. Expanded engine fuel charges will urge the clients to moderate the earth and lessen clog.</span>
