Will the argument between Azaz was that Azaz like to read and than mathematician like to do math the argument happened when Azaz said that writing or reading is better, but than mathematician disagree with it.
rewrite in your own words
Journal Response 7
Summary
"The medical doctors accurately suggest a alternate of air and surroundings to the sick," Thoreau writes withinside the very last bankruptcy. Despite Thoreau's repeated portrayal of Walden Pond because the maximum healing of all locations, it seems that staying there did now no longer treatment him of something disease he changed into struggling from. Thoreau now advises journey, however now no longer always bodily journey withinside the bodily world: "Home-cosmography" is even greater instructive. He says, "I actually have greater of God, [travelers] have greater of the road."One of the maximum vital elements on this bankruptcy is what Thoreau discovered via dwelling at Walden Pond: "If one is going fearlessly withinside the course of his ambitions, and tries to stay the existence which he has envisaged. In maximum respects, Thoreau has been a hit at Walden Pond. He has proven excessive braveness in his individualism. In simplifying his existence and dwelling on my own withinside the woods, he has performed some thing that others have now no longer performed, and he has performed it well. What is greater important, he has eloquently recorded his mind approximately his experiences. He has tested self-dedication in finishing his number one cause for dwelling at Walden Pond. He went there to stay intentionally and to study himself, and he has performed that.
No, Lay testimony is the evidence brought in light by the witness who is not an expert but can testify to interferences and opinions.
Lay opinion testimony is admissible as long as it helps as a factfinder and rationally depends on the personal perceptions. Lay witness’ opinions are often more helpful than the other raw data which form the base of the belief.
Lay opinion testimony refers to evidence given by a witness who is not qualified as an expert but who testifies to opinions or inferences. For example, a testimony showing a person was “angry” or “ excited” is more convincing and understandable compared to a lengthy, physical description of the man’s outward expression.
The law as stated in the book(decree/act) is known the following:
USCS Fed Rules Evid R 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses.
Additionally, it is limited to opinions which are rational, helpful and not based on specific knowledge under Rule 702.
<span>Emerson might advocate the benefits of consistency in the natural world. If one day, the grass was green, and the next, it was blue, Emerson might rethink his whole philosophy with hating conformity. Of course, it is good to be unique, but grass of a same species, should be uniform and stay the “right” color.</span>
Answer:
"I think you're beautiful but I will beat you if you continue bragging about your looks" or "*insert name here*, you're pretty or whatever but you do too much and it makes you a little ugly"
Explanation:
good luck haha