Answer:
Point: One effect of being an Upstander when confronted with a bullying situation is that it, in most cases, ends the bullying as far as the person being bullied is concerned.
Explanation:
Evidence: This happened to me when I was in third grade. I was a serial victim of one of my classmates until another classmate who had just joined the class from another school stood up to him on my behalf.
Explanation: Many bullies continue in their nefarious practices because rather than discourage their actions, others out of fear either act as their sidekick (thus joining and aiding them), endorse their action by laughing at the bullied thus acting as a reinforcer, or they simply ignore because they are either indifferent or unable to do anything about it. These are called outsiders.
Because bullies are normally used to inflicting fear and terror, they are usually taken aback and can't handle the situation (in most cases) when out of the blues, someone stands up to them.
Linkback: So because bullies have fears too, and often prey on the "weak", when anyone is brave enough to stand up to them for themselves or for another person, they usually just back down. Sometimes, out of ego, they may attempt to test the strenght of the upstander. With repeated successful resistance, they finally let go of the bullied.
Cheers
Answer: It can change by ... (read below)
Explanation:
The government can place all or part of the state's most critical leadership system, administrative apparatus, or bureaucracy. It can be the deliberate product of outside force, as in warfare. Rollback is the military strategy to impose a regime change by defeating an enemy and removing its regime by force.
Answer:
Because of John Marshall, the Supreme Court can review the constitutionality of federal laws that allegedly contradict the Constitution of the United States. This arises from the ruling in Marbury v. Madison, written by Chief Justice Marshall.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison is the most significant precedent of the Supreme Court, which gave the power to oversee the constitutionality of laws, as well as to protect the human rights and freedoms of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution.
In this matter, the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is established in cases where there are differing opinions of appellate courts, when a federal law is being evaluated, and especially when a constitutional issue is raised.
In this way, this ruling modified the system of "checks and balances", allowing the federal judiciary to control legislative and executive power in certain cases. This specific power of the judiciary is not enshrined in the Constitution, but has been put into practice through judicial review. It implies the right of courts to declare invalid and to repeal acts of executive and legislative power (both of the President and of Congress) which are considered contrary to the Constitution. The Supreme Court, through judicial review, cannot amend the Constitution, but can only interpret and apply it in a manner it deems appropriate.
Strep throat is the answer
