Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
1. The Boston Sons of Liberty showed their opposition on December 16, 1773, when they threw tea being brought into the American colonies by the British East India Company overboard the sea. The event is known as the Boston Tea Party and it was a result of the <em>Tea Act</em> passed by the British Parliament who gave their company the monopoly to import tea to the colonies.
2. I think that they decided to destroy the tea because if it got to the American colonies, they would be bought by people and this would affect the sales of tea by the American traders who sourced their tea from the Dutch. The taxes imposed on this tea as well as the monopoly that was granted to the British East India Company would also have negative consequences on the economy of the colonists.
3. They might have allowed the tea to land and then explain to the people reasons why they should boycott it. I do not think that this would have been effective because some people would have still found a way to buy the tea once it was within their reach.
4. Activism, lobbying, dialogue with the appropriate authorities, and peaceful protests should be the best routes to consider in countering laws perceived as unjust by the American citizenry.
Answer:
e. Internal environment
Explanation:
Molly Madison would be considered a part of the <em>internal environment</em> for Internal Workings. The internal environment is made of the conditions and factors that are part of the organization. The internal environment defines key aspects as leadership, management and the behavior of employees. According to this corporate culture, Molly has received her award.
I would say the following:
1) access to food and water. This means that they should be next to water sources (rivers) and fertile ground
2) construction material: wood and/or stones
I would say that a location on a trade route would also be beneficial (and rivers were trade routes: this explains why so many cities were on rivers!)
Answer:
The answer is True.
Refer below for the explanation.
Explanation:
Therefore,
In "Democracy, Climate Change and Global Governance" authors Held and Hervey argued that modern democracies are less able to respond to complex global issues because they suffer from interest group concentration. By this they meant that our political system requires politicians to respond to small, well organized interest groups with narrow interests.True
