Answer:
The code to this question can be given as:
Code:
public interface Test //define interface
{
public abstract Duration getDuration(); //define method
getDuration.
public abstract Result check(int a);
//define method
check .
public abstract double getScore();
//define method getScore.
}
Explanation:
In the above code, we define an interface that is "Test" inside an interface, we define three methods that can be defined as:
- First, we define a method that is "getDuration" that method returns Duration as an object.
- Second, we define a method that is "check" this method accepts an integer parameter that is a and return Result.
- The third method is "getScore" this method will return a double value.
The appropriate answer is C ! all other are very limited but labour can be increased or decreased according to our will and it doesn't exhaust !
<span>There are several reasons why two devices are not synchronized: maybe there are not the same versions of the programs on both devices, maybe the software needs restart in order to have the latest input data, maybe the internet connection was lost during synchronization
Next steps would be:
- restart the devices
- Update to the latest version
- connect to the internet
- make the synchronization again
</span>
Since both arrays are already sorted, that means that the first int of one of the arrays will be smaller than all the ints that come after it in the same array. We also know that if the first int of arr1 is smaller than the first int of arr2, then by the same logic, the first int of arr1 is smaller than all the ints in arr2 since arr2 is also sorted.
public static int[] merge(int[] arr1, int[] arr2) {
int i = 0; //current index of arr1
int j = 0; //current index of arr2
int[] result = new int[arr1.length+arr2.length]
while(i < arr1.length && j < arr2.length) {
result[i+j] = Math.min(arr1[i], arr2[j]);
if(arr1[i] < arr2[j]) {
i++;
} else {
j++;
}
}
boolean isArr1 = i+1 < arr1.length;
for(int index = isArr1 ? i : j; index < isArr1 ? arr1.length : arr2.length; index++) {
result[i+j+index] = isArr1 ? arr1[index] : arr2[index]
}
return result;
}
So this implementation is kind of confusing, but it's the first way I thought to do it so I ran with it. There is probably an easier way, but that's the beauty of programming.
A quick explanation:
We first loop through the arrays comparing the first elements of each array, adding whichever is the smallest to the result array. Each time we do so, we increment the index value (i or j) for the array that had the smaller number. Now the next time we are comparing the NEXT element in that array to the PREVIOUS element of the other array. We do this until we reach the end of either arr1 or arr2 so that we don't get an out of bounds exception.
The second step in our method is to tack on the remaining integers to the resulting array. We need to do this because when we reach the end of one array, there will still be at least one more integer in the other array. The boolean isArr1 is telling us whether arr1 is the array with leftovers. If so, we loop through the remaining indices of arr1 and add them to the result. Otherwise, we do the same for arr2. All of this is done using ternary operations to determine which array to use, but if we wanted to we could split the code into two for loops using an if statement.
