The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
Deafening silence, seriously funny, living dead.
Abarham Lincoln has been described.
Please mark as brainliest and pls say thanks.
Thanks,
N111ANCY
In order to get the evidence that is relevant to the theme, it's important for one to understand the plot of the story.
<h3>What is a theme?</h3>
Your information is incomplete because you didn't provide the passage. Therefore, an overview will be given.
In this case, it's important to read and understand the story. Then, it's important to analyze the theme, plot, and characters in the story.
Then, you can then get the evidence that is relevant to the theme of the passage.
Learn more about themes on:
brainly.com/question/11600913
