<span>Businesses and citizens acted for their individual
best interest. Many people blamed Hoover because he was president at the
time, but it was not his fault because the people of that time acted
under their own interest and no one volunteered. Hope this helps.
</span>
Martin Lurther King Jr is by far one of my favourite historical figures. What he did is very inspirational, and teaches many of us (not only the minority) that we can still make a difference, even in times of difficulty.
At rechieving his Nobel Peace Prize, Martin Lurther King Jr, delivered a speech that touched many hearts. It was about the fight to freedom.
"...win the racial injustice...I accept...we move with determination...establish a rain of freedom...our children crying out of brotherhood...trying to secure the right to vote...who were brutalized...unrelenting struggle...this movement is [to achieve]...that non-violence is the answer to the political and moral questions on our time...without resorting to violence and oppression...have demonstrated that non-violence...is a POWERFUL moral force..."\
Answer: D
I hope this helps :)
<span>When
it was over, the Viet Cong basically ceased to be an effective force
any longer. Their ranks were decimated. All of the territory lost during
the offensive was shortly won back. But the ability of the Communists
to launch such a widespread coordinated offensive convinced the American
media and ultimately the American public that the war was now a lost
cause and demanded a withdrawal. So, tactically, it was a military
success for the U.S. but it served as a public relations success for
North Vietnam.
I believe the answer may be </span>
<span>U.S. forces dealt the Vietcong a massive military loss and regained control of all areas that the Vietcong had attacked.</span>
