The Treaty of Paris signed in 1763, was the end of the "French-Indian war", a conflict which took place among three major powers at the time : France, Britain and Spain which fought for the colonies in North America. These powers had Native American tribes allied with each one of them and it is called "French - Indian War" because the British considered the French and the Natives to be their enemies.
Spain might have contemplated this as a victory as it expanded its territories to the east, adding territories to their already vast empire of South and Central America. France basically lost their territories in North America,and their interest of exploiting natural resources such as furs. Finally, although British and Americans expanded their territories to the west, this entreprise was greatly expensive for Britain.
Answer:
She should be prosecuted
Explanation:
In order to convict a defendant of malicious destruction of property, the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
The defendant destroyed or damaged the personal property, building, or dwelling house of another person;
The defendant did so willfully; and.
The defendant acted with malice.
I copied this online, so don't copy, but this shows why you could convict Tracy of the crime. She destroyed people's personal property, their phones, which she did willfully. This goes to show why she should be prosecuted and charged. Thanks, and I hope this helps! BRAINLIEST PLEASE!
A major focus of AIM in the 1960s was dealing with racism against Native Americans, but they also dealt with Native American sovereignty and treaty issues.
You dont need big forces to take on the enemy, i was taught that it is more of a hit and run stragedy to help limit casualties
