The answer is b) It created resentment and often hindered negotiations in Europe.
Let's look into it one by one:
a) It established unity and peace among European countries. -This is not true.
-Nationalism has caused the civilian of nations to want to protect themselves as well as get national glory by getting land. This caused territorial conflict and hostility between each nations instead of peace and unity.
b) It created resentment and often hindered negotiations in Europe. - This is correct.
-As mentioned, nationalism has caused conflicts of territorial interest between nations. The nations were wary against one another that they might be attacked. They are also unwilling to back down in order to get national glory and show their superiority of the nation. This had indeed caused resentment and many negotiations went unsuccessful such as the disarmament conference.
c)The feelings of nationalism created a wave a optimism about peace in Europe. - This is incorrect.
- The feeling of nationalism had caused the up rise of aggression which made the nations to be suspicious towards one another causing negative impact about peace in Europe.
d) Nationalism had no impact on Europe during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.-This is false.
-As the above mentioned, nationalism had significant impact on the development in Europe.
Therefore the answer is b) It created resentment and often hindered negotiations in Europe.
Hope it helps!
Answer:
The ancient Sumerians, believed their gods lived in the sky. In order for the gods to hear better, you needed to get closer to them. Ziggurats were huge, with built in steps. The priests would collect and use these gifts since they were the representatives of the gods on earth.
Explanation:
Answer:
he envisioned a better future, founded upon four freedoms: the "four essential human freedoms," some traditional and some new ones. The four freedoms he outlined were freedom of speech, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear.
Explanation:
Answer:
the bystander effect
Explanation:
The bystander effect is the social psychological phenomenon that occurs when individuals are less likely to intervene to help someone in an emergency. The greater the number of observer present at the site of a situation, the less likely would be a probability of helping hand. In contrast to this people would react more likely when there no or few witnessed present. There are many reasons recorded-for this effect like ambiguity, diffusion of responsibility, cultural difference, etc.
