Nabokov organized his essay in an exceedingly typical manner; he states his plan then uses proof to support it. He additionally explains his read on what makes a decent author initial then what makes a decent reader. This is smart as a result of one should initial perceive the author before understanding the reader. He uses samples of what created a decent author to clarify what would create a decent reader. “The writer is the initial man to mop it and to form the natural objects it contains (…) The panting and happy reader, and there they spontaneously embrace and are linked forever if the book lasts forever.” This possibly implies that a good author makes a cheerful reader. so a cheerful reader is one that has understood the piece clearly, creating them a good reader. author then offers his definition of literature before closing the essay, giving the reader that last little bit of information that wraps literature, the reader, and also the author all at once, “To the story teller we turn for entertainment, for mental excitement of the simplest kind, for emotional participation,for the pleasure of traveling in some remote region in space or time.”
Answer:
Explanation:
I love macbeth so this will be easy!
strong willed - lady macbeth
Loyal - Banquo
wavering- macbeth
meek- Duncan
Answer: I would say about specific
Explanation:
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "<span> To refuse to apply moral judgments to other cultures is to fail to take those other cultures seriously." This is what </span><span>Mary Midgley use example of the samurai to illustrate</span>
