Answer:C : for ukee dooks
Explanation:
Answer:
B. How do water striders skim across the surfaces of ponds and lakes? Their hydrophobic legs are uniquely suited to this process, but the insects
Explanation:
Below are the options given:
<em>A. NO CHANGE</em>
<em>B. How do water striders skim across the surfaces of ponds and lakes? Their hydrophobic legs are uniquely suited to this process, but the insects</em>
<em>C. How do our bodies break down the food we consume every day? While digestion would be impossible without enzymes and other proteins, these molecules</em>
<em>D. How does our DNA maintain a double helical structure? While the shape of this nucleic acid is the result of many complex properties, its structures</em>
Option B is correct because it gives a concrete, casually observable example from the natural world and thereby accomplishes the goal. It explains the connection between surface tension and electronegativity.
Option B gives an example from the natural world - the water strider.
The water striders are a good example of insects that use the high surface tension of water and long, hydrophobic legs. This enables them to walk on water. Their legs are coated with a hydrophobic substance. The hydrophobic substance makes the legs to repel water molecules i.e it makes water unable to stick to their legs. This makes them to easily skim on water surfaces.
The Word Lake is prepositional, so i guess,"Walked alongside the Lake."
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Obeying God's law or that of Creon's
Answer:
When using logic to reach your reader/audience, you are trying to get them to think - use their brain. Not their feelings, or what their opinion may be. You want to use empirical evidence or facts to state what you know. The answer choice I would choose would be answer would be A. A logically tells me that there is more out there and that the ocean floor in all has not been mapped.
Explanation:
B - this is an opinion due to the words, "it feels"
C - lends an air of mystery - still based on what I think it might look like
D - using the word clearly seems to me that they are trying to just convince you of a fact not true evidence.
Only A give the logical answer that we all <em>know</em> that all of the ocean floors have not been mapped.
