Answer:
Minor v. Happersett (1874)
Explanation:
This court case was presented on appeal by Virginia Minor, a member of the National Woman Suffrage Association, after being denied registration to vote in St. Louis in 1872. She sued Reese Happersett because he was the voting registrar.
The case was not successful at the time, as the Supreme Court ruled that women´s right to vote was not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which showed the court was not the place to fight for voting rights for women.
The following actions were centered on the review of state voting laws and the ratification of an amendment to the Constitution. It wouldn´t be until 1920 that Minor v. Happersett was overruled by the Nineteenth Amendment that prohibited discrimination in voting rights based on sex.
It reflects the principle of "Checks and Balances". Checks and balances is when the 3 branches get to check on each other to make sure that no branch is abusing their power. The judicial branch can declare a law unconstitutional, and can impeach the president if necessary. The executive branch elects the judges for the Supreme Court, and can veto a law. The legislative branch can override a veto
B.
or
D.
you choose
I am sorry i cannot get and exact answer.
Answer:
<h2>please give me free brainest</h2>
Explanation:
James Prescott Joule
James Prescott Joule FRS FRSE was an English physicist, mathematician and brewer, born in Salford, Lancashire. Joule studied the nature of heat, and discovered its relationship to mechanical work. This led to the law of conservation of energy, which in turn led to the development of the first law of thermodynamics. The SI derived unit of energy, the joule, is named after him.
