All of the statements are examples of collective ownership in the socialist countries.
Collective ownership, at it's core, represents ownership of something, most commonly land and industrial assets, from all members of a group for the mutual benefit of all. This was implemented in most of the socialistic countries, but still the main and dominant owner was usually the government itself, while the people had shares in most of the industries and land.
Because the presidency was decided by a vote he simply rigged the vote. that and he had followers i mean one man against a whole country that doesn't like him doesn't seem to hard to pick the wjnner
Their Blitzkrieg tactics was so brutal and quick
The possibility of increased European involvement in the America's trouble President Monrow. There was also concerns about Russias intentions for controlling land in the northwest. <span>
</span>