1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anni [7]
3 years ago
13

Colonization is to economic,religious,and political,as exploration is to claim land

History
1 answer:
artcher [175]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

yo answer is b

Explanation:

did it on eg

You might be interested in
The compromise of 1877 brought an end to radical reconstruction by providing for the A. resignation of president rutherford B.re
baherus [9]

Answer:

The correct answer is B. The Compromise of 1877 brought an end to radical reconstruction by providing for the removal of Federal troops from southern states.

Explanation:

The Compromise of 1877 was an informal pact reached in the United States after the disputed presidential elections of 1876 between the republican Rutherford B. Hayes and the democrat Samuel J. Tilden. According to the "compromise", and after several controversies among the polling stations on the results of the elections, it was agreed to grant the presidency to Hayes, in exchange for his regime accepting certain demands of the Democratic Party led by Tilden; among them, removing Federal troops from the South.

5 0
3 years ago
What brought britain and the united states to the brink of war in 1837?
Naddika [18.5K]
The correct answer is the Canadian Rebellion

It was an event in 1837 in which the Lower and Upper Canada had a series of rebellions against Britain because of the way they were treated as colonies. This brought them on the Brink of war with the United States for various reasons, mostly about Britain controlling areas on the New World and the fact that Canada didn't look the same as it does today.
4 0
3 years ago
What does Wilson mean when he says, "They have shamed us in the eyes of the world"?
Greeley [361]
, I received from President Wilson<span> the following cabled message: ... the treaty by the Senate with reservations </span>will<span> put the United States as clearly out of the .... His only comment was, "</span>They have shamed us in the eyes of the world<span>. ... "Ah, but our enemies have poisoned the wells of public opinion," </span>he said<span>.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
(NEED HELP) In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
liberstina [14]

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

6 0
3 years ago
Designed to protect American jobs and farmers from foreign competition. Raised U.S. tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to rec
andriy [413]

Answer:

Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act

Explanation:

Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act is also known as US Tariff Act of 1930. It was a legislation to raise the import duties so the American farmers and businesses could be protected.  The legislation got its name from Willis Hawley of Oregon and Reed Smoot of Utah.

Smoot was a senator from Utah and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee while Hawley was chariman of House Ways and Means committee. It was most harsh protectionist tariff in the country's history and raised the import tax by 40 percent.

It was done because American farmers were facing declining prices and competition after first world war during 1920s and the government wanted to improve their situation.  The legislation was passed by narrow margin(44-42) and president Hoover signed the bill on June 17, 1930 and it became a law.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Roman religion change at the beginning of the Roman Empire?
    9·2 answers
  • Which factor contributed most to the beginning of the women's-rights movement in the United States during the mid-1800s?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the import of the Southern Manifesto?
    7·1 answer
  • Which action would have been illegal under the English Bill of Rights?
    11·1 answer
  • How effective were Union and Confederate strategies to mobilize their populations for the war effort?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the 2018 election are accurate?
    12·1 answer
  • According to the map which statement are true about early human migration
    11·1 answer
  • Describe the parisian catacombs
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!