Answer:
if you are talking about hydrolocking then it is:
Explanation:
Hydrolocking is when an engine either seizes or suffers catastrophic failure due to the ingress of a substantial volume of water in the cylinders. With an internal combustion engine effectively resembling a form of air pump, the internals are all designed to deal with the compression of air.
In my opinion, the most important similarity between these two men is that they are both democrats. They both believe in the common people rather than in elites.
Jefferson was the leader of the Democratic-Republicans. This was the party that wanted more power for the common people. They wanted there to be less hierarchy in American society. They wanted America to be dominated by small farmers.
Jackson also favored the common people. He wanted to do things like destroying the Bank of the United States because he felt that it favored the rich over the common people.
hope it helps <3
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any further references or attachments, we can say that the sectional conflict was a combination of an irrepressible conflict with the work of bungling politicians, fanatics, and agitators.
Before the Civil War, there were many incidents, events, and decisions that create more separation in the views of the northerners and southerners. In the North, the idea of abolitionism was supported by most states, while in the South, slavery was an important part of the economy. Indeed, southern states depended on slaves to produce the crops in large plantations. These crops had to be exported to Europe.
The Missouri Compromise or the Kansas-Nebraska Act was the product of different points of view from legislators trying to fix things until the problems too many that made seven states seceded from the Union, and later, the beginning of the Civil War.
The treaty of Versailles was a bad idea. It benefited countries like Britain, France and America as they where the top powers to come out of the war. It blamed all of the damages caused to their countries squarely on the Germans simply because Germany was the best target. The German where forced to surrender all their foreign lands. They where forbidden from entering the Rhineland. They where forbidden from uniting with Austria. They where forced to pay reparations to the winning side after the war, leaving the German people and the Wiemar republic in poverty! If it wasn't for all these terms suppressing Germany, Hitler would never pushed the boundaries of the treaty, the Nazi's where unlikely to ever rise to such power as they where elected as a last hope when Germany lost faith in democracy and therefore Britain would not have had to declare war on Germany for taking over Poland and Slovakia, entering the Rhine and uniting with Austria. It is often said that WW1 was just a build up to world war two, as if it wasn't for the treaty of versailles none of this was ever going to or even had a possibility f happening.
The influx of scholars and artists from Byzantine Empire contributed to the intellectual life of the renaissance.
<h3>What was the renaissance era?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the era that ushered in a great increase in the classical period. It was the time that saw the increase in the arts and the science period in the world especially in the European continent.
It is the period that is called the era of cultural , scientific, economic and politic rebirth in Europe after the middle ages. Hence we can say that: The influx of scholars and artists from Byzantine Empire contributed to the intellectual life of the renaissance.
Read more on renaissance era here: brainly.com/question/879750
#SPJ1
