Answer:
No, I do not think it was necessary.
Explanation:
The Sedition act was uncharacteristic of the initial thoughts of the forefathers of the United States because it went against the freedom of speech and freedom of press. Although it seemed to be a quick fix to stop dissention in the U.S. with anti war sentiment, it also invalidated the very constitution for which the U.S stood on. There could have been better ways to handle it such as educating the public better on what exactly was happening, and why we might as a country needed to become involved in the war.
Answer:
Tundra
Explanation:
India is a warm place for the most part. Tundra is really only near the arctic circle.
Napoleon replaced existing Monarchs with members of his own family. His aim was to replace existing empire with one of his, which would have made him and his family rule wholly. Resistance to to French occupation and French puppet rulers was often based on nationalist sentiments, but it's doubtful whether it would have remained a popular cause with the masses after Napoleon's final defeat.
It reduced the labor of removing seeds
The Federalist. The major argument is the constitution gave too much power to the government
