1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jok3333 [9.3K]
3 years ago
6

after world war 2, latin american countries looked forward to a new, enhanced ‘good neighbor policy’ what did they expect and wh

at was accomplished?
History
1 answer:
MrRa [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Good Neighbor Policy was the foreign policy that was led by President Franklin Roosevelt and his administration regarding the countries of Latin America. The United States wanted to have good relations with its neighbors, especially at a time when conflicts were beginning to take hold, and this policy was more or less meant to gather support in Latin America. Through the Good Neighbor Policy, the United States was to keep its eye on Latin America in a more peaceful way than in the past. This in fact ended with unpopular military interventions and switched to other methods to cope with the impacts of Latin America: pan-Americanism, support for strong local tenants, national guard training, economic and cultural interference, export-import bank loans, and monitoring of finance and political subversion.

You might be interested in
Give me all history answers for 1.15 I will give you 65 pionts
Bumek [7]

Explanation:

ermmmmmmmmm what's the questions haha

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Bush, why can’t Iraq be allowed to succeed in its invasion?
nika2105 [10]
The correct answer is B
8 0
3 years ago
How was machiavelli a humanist?
zubka84 [21]

Answer:Machiavelli’s realism

Niccolò Machiavelli, whose work derived from sources as authentically humanistic as those of Ficino, proceeded along a wholly opposite course. A throwback to the chancellor-humanists Salutati, Bruni, and Poggio, he served Florence in a similar capacity and with equal fidelity, using his erudition and eloquence in a civic cause. Like Vittorino and other early humanists, he believed in the centrality of historical studies, and he performed a signally humanistic function by creating, in La mandragola (1518; The Mandrake), the first vernacular imitation of Roman comedy. His unswerving concentration on human weakness and institutional corruption suggests the influence of Boccaccio; and, like Boccaccio, he used these reminders less as topical satire than as practical gauges of human nature. In one way at least, Machiavelli is more humanistic (i.e., closer to the classics) than the other humanists, for while Vittorino and his school ransacked history for examples of virtue, Machiavelli (true to the spirit of Polybius, Livy, Plutarch, and Tacitus) embraced all of history—good, evil, and indifferent—as his school of reality. Like Salutati, though perhaps with greater self-awareness, Machiavelli was ambiguous as to the relative merits of republics and monarchies. In both public and private writings—especially the Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio (1531; Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy)—he showed a marked preference for republican government, but in The Prince (1532) he developed, with apparent approval, a model of radical autocracy. For this reason, his goals have remained unclear.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Young people have historically failed to participate in the election process - fewer young people vote than those of other age g
Nikolay [14]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Indeed, young people have historically failed to participate in the election process - fewer young people vote than those of other age groups.

I think this occurs because young people feel there is a lot of corruption and lies in the political system, and that politicians do not act with integrity.

Many youngsters notice how legislators endlessly argue with each other in the House of Representatives and the Senate, or how is the relationship between the executive branch and the legislative branch. And they don't like what they see. They turn to the other side

How does this negatively impact democracy in the US?

Of course, that behavior is not good because youngsters are the next generation that is going to run the United States.

They have to be prepared, informed, ready to fill the highest political spots and corporative spots to take the US into the next decade. And if they are not informed and actively participate in politics, it is going to be difficult for them to understand what the country needs to move forward.

7 0
3 years ago
Please help I'm being timed!
belka [17]
The Effect of Miranda vs. Arkansas
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Do you think it would be possible for the United States to accept a royal family? Explain
    5·1 answer
  • What is the amplitude of a function
    15·1 answer
  • Every state but Nebraska has a bicameral legislature
    12·2 answers
  • True or False: It is illegal to park on any bridge or overpass or in any tunnel.
    6·2 answers
  • Why might a u.s historian study the americas , africas and europe before 1500
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me. I will give Brainlist
    15·2 answers
  • What do you think Private Suffers from when he loses his sight?
    12·1 answer
  • Sparta finally was able to defeat athens at the end of the peloponnesian war​
    10·1 answer
  • Plzz help fast due 9 min /math
    11·1 answer
  • Before the War of 1812, the United States wanted to
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!