The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The question is incomplete. Indeed, here we do not have a question, just a statement. After the statement, the full question must say:<em> "Decide if the situation jeopardizes the government's legitimacy."</em>
What is the situation? The statement above-mentioned.
So the situation is this:
Three top military generals overthrow the country's government. The generals are very popular with the citizens, who cheer by the thousands in streets across the country.
Under this situation, the legitimacy is not jeopardized because it was the people who supported the generals to overthrow the country's government. So we can say that the generals are legit because they received the support of the people and that is why they succeeded. The people believe in them.
Let's remember that in politics, the concept of legitimacy means that the people think that their ruler is the right one, the capable one, and has the support of the citizens.
The other three important concepts of a solid government are Power, Authority, and Sovereignty.
A efforts to get people to vote
Answer:
no
Explanation:
not everyone will follow these rules and besides that not everyone is familiar with them so the ignorance of this declaration makes it ineffective
The Korean war lasted about three years but the Korean Armistice Agreement only ceased-fire. It did not end the war.
Meaning that it did not end after three years. It was only announced recently as of 2018 that the war might possibly come to a close after I believe at least over 60 years.
Answer:
By article 25 of the Treaty of Berlin, 1878, Austria-Hungary was permitted to occupy and administer Bosnia and Herzegovina. The crisis in 1908-1909 sprang from the fact that Serbia believed that she must prevent the consummation of annexation by Austria-Hungary or give up permanently her long-cherished hopes.
