Answer:
your answer would be A.
Step-by-step explanation:
Already you know that answers b and d are not an option because it is saying she can use OVER 45 dollars. So she has to use EQUAL or less then 45 dollars. So the answer has to be A or C. In answer C it is saying she can spend MORE then 2.50 for a bunch where she cant. She has to spend exactly or less then that amount. So your answer is A.
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
Below in bold.
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the 2 sides marked with the double lines are equal:
5y-1 = 2y+11
3y = 12
y = 4.
Also :
3x-5 + 2(2x+5) = 180
3x - 5 + 4x + 10 = 180
7x = 180 + 5 -10
7x = 175
x = 175/7 = 25.
Answer:
(-7.5, 0) x intercept
(0, 5.5) y intercept
Step-by-step explanation:
The x intercept is where it crosses the x axis
It crosses at (-7.5, 0)
The y intercept is where it crosses the y axis
It crosses at (0, 5.5)
Answer:
The correct answer is the tor mar nada tor buda tor buni ami chai
