Answer:They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations.The United States' use of nuclear weapons to end World War II led to a determined and soon successful effort by the Soviet Union to acquire such weapons, followed by a long-running nuclear arms race between the two superpowers. The Soviet Union conducted its first nuclear test in 1949.In 1949, the USSR tested its first atomic bomb. This led to a race between the two superpowers to amass the most powerful nuclear weapons with the most effective delivery systems. ... Tension was greatly increased as a result of the developing arms race which served to militarise both sides and bring war closer.
Explanation:
(happy to help)
Well, from looking at the chart, it seems that there's a huge loss of life on the "winning" side. I believe the people of those countries must've felt emotionally and economically defeated. Considering the great amount of lives lost during the war, I'd say it would effect the society emotionally and there'd be fewer people around. And during wars countries usually use lots of money and weaponry to fund the cause, so those nations must've been in a huge economic crisis once the war ended. <span />
Answer:
An allusion authors to another literary work without naming it. The author refers to the Bible. The men knelt at Lincoln's feet praising him calling him the Messiah. Lincoln did not want to enter as a king referring to Jesus entering the town on Psalm Sunday. Lincoln had many who followed, like Jesus disciples.
Explanation:
We finished the book and explained it in class today. Analyzing The Text
B. He is the father of the public library, and c and d
