The poverty of East Asia makes the region more susceptible to natural hazards.
East Asia Pacific is the most disaster-stricken region in the world. Cities are highly populated, with slums growing fast in high risk areas. This population ignore the risks from natural disasters, climate change and precautions for all this. When disaster strikes, the vulnerable, are hit the hardest. It causes a large loss of life since the population amount is high and does not have the adequate precautions and disaster education.
Answer:
based on research none of these seem to be third world
Explanation:
third world countries were countries not tied to soviet union or united states
Answer:
Europe and the Old World would have had less agricultural products and the Americas would have had less animals products.
Explanation:
Europe would be much poorer in food crops without the Colombian Exchange. Potatoes a staple in Ireland, Vodka in Russia, and raised throughout Europe and Africa would not exist.
Corn or maize would not have been available to Europe and Africa. Maize quickly became the staple food crop in Africa. It was Maize that allowed the Bantu to spread from West Africa to dominate East and Southern Africa.
Italian cooking would not have Tomato sauce, no pizza, spaghetti, or other now "traditional " Italian dishes.
The Americas would have few domesticated animals. The horse that became ionic in the plains Indians came from Europe. Cows and Oxen would not provide meat, milk and in the past muscle for plowing and hauling would not exist. Even the humble chicken with its eggs would not be a source of protein.
The Americas would be much poorer without the Colombian Exchange. There would be few sources of animal protein beside hunting, Agriculture without the strength of domesticated animals were been much more limited.
Both the Old World and the New World benefited from the Colombian Exchange. The World is much richer for the exchange of ideas and products due to the Colombian Exchange.
Answer:
The empire spanned over 3,000 years. ... However, history shows that even the mightiest empires can fall and after 1,100 BC, Egypt went into decline. There were several reasons for this including a loss of military power, lack of natural resources, and political conflicts.Explanation:
Answer:
it rejected scientific thinking