1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yulyashka [42]
4 years ago
12

Economic stability is a situation in which the economy experiences constant growth, trade,or stability and low trade, unemployme

nt, or inflation .
History
2 answers:
Arlecino [84]4 years ago
5 0

Answer: Economists view the term Economic stability as a state of constant economic growth along with low inflation.


Explanation: When economy of any country is growing positively it ultimately reduces the inflation in a country. Thus we can say that they are inversely proportional to each other, means when you see increasing inflation, it indicates that the economic growth is either negative or stagnated however, when inflation is decreasing it indicates that the economy of a country is growing positively.

mariarad [96]4 years ago
4 0
 the answer would be B. growth and low A. inflation. 
You might be interested in
According to greek mythology which god or goddess stopped growing when persephone was kiddnapped
bulgar [2K]
Demeter, the Goddess of the Harvest. What happened was that Demeter wanted to get her daughter back from Hades, so she took a "resignation" from her duties as the harvest goddess and all plants were decaying on Earth, and droughts started.
6 0
3 years ago
What was the main reason for Russian expansion in the 1800
Free_Kalibri [48]
To get to better land to farm I think! I hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
List the Alliances Powers and Central Powers during WWI. (World War 1)
FromTheMoon [43]
The Central Powers consisted of Austria-Hungary, Germany, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire.
The Alliance Powers consisted of Serbia, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, and the United States.
5 0
3 years ago
Is America a land of liberty ? Why?
Alex Ar [27]
NO OTHER country puts as much emphasis on “freedom” as the United States. Patrick Henry demanded “liberty or death”. The national anthem calls America “the land of the free”. Great reformers from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King have urged America to live up to its ideal of “freedom”. When a group of French Americanophiles wanted to flatter the United States, they sent the Statue of Liberty.

And no other country boasts as much about its mission to give freedom to the rest of the world. Woodrow Wilson thought that he had a God-given duty to bring liberty to mankind. George Bush regards his foreign policy as a crusade for freedom—“the right and hope of all humanity”.

But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act.

Government whistleblowers have repeatedly been punished or fired—even when they have been trying to expose threats to national security that their bosses preferred to overlook. Richard Levernier had his security clearance revoked for revealing that some of the country's nuclear facilities were not properly secured. Border security agents have been punished for pointing out that the border is inadequately monitored, and airport baggage-handlers and security people for pointing to weaknesses in the security system. The Office of Special Counsel, which was established to enforce laws designed to protect the rights of such people, is widely regarded as “inept and even hostile to whistleblowers”.

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.

Freedom House's strictures are, if anything, too soft. America insists on criminalising victimless crimes such as prostitution. Last week Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, committed suicide; the government had thrown the book at her, including racketeering and mail fraud, because it really wished to penalise the arranging of assignations between consenting adults. In her suicide note to her mother she wrote that she could not “live the next six-to-eight years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching'.”

5 0
3 years ago
the lord is my shepherd I shall not want he lies me down in green pastures he leads me to still waters and restores my soul what
ryzh [129]

Answer:

psalms 23: 1-3

Explanation:

brainliest if u can pls

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Some scholars believe that before they can have true civilization, societies must develop _____.
    12·2 answers
  • In a federalist system of government, how are powers divided?
    14·1 answer
  • What did the nazi-soviet pact accomplish for germany study guide?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following are characteristics of the Boers? Select all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • What was one major difference between the Commercial Revolution and the
    7·1 answer
  • The conservative party that ruled through the 1980s and early 1990s was replaced by which political party?
    12·1 answer
  • What things can you do improve the style of your report? Add more reasons to support your main claim. Move some of your paragrap
    6·1 answer
  • What was the social impact of the 15th amendment
    10·1 answer
  • Alexander the Great and his father, Philip, were originally from which of the following regions?
    10·1 answer
  • “Was violence the answer to bring significant political and social changes for a new revolution of government among the colonies
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!