All categories

2 years ago

What is the image of (-3,-5)) after a reflection over the x-axis?

Mathematics

2 answers:

Vedmedyk [2.9K]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

(-3,5)

Step-by-step explanation:

When you reflect over the x axis, the y value's sign changes.

So we have:

-3,5

oee [108]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

(-3,5) the graph is below

You might be interested in

Estimate the area of Alberta in square miles. Show your reasoning

ella [17]

Answer: About $278,250\ mi^2$

Step-by-step explanation:

The missing figure is attached.

Notice in the first picture that Alberta has a complex shape.

You can calculate the area of a complex shape by decomposing it into polygons whose areas can be calculated easily.

Observe the second picture. Notice that it can be descompose into two polygons: A trapezoid and a rectangle.

The area of the trapezoid can be calcualted with the formula:

$A_t=\frac{h}{2}(B+b)$

Where "h" is the height, "B" is the long base and "b" is short base.

And the area of the rectangle can be found with the formula:

$A_r=lw$

Wkere "l" is the lenght and "w" is the width.

Then, the apprximate area of Alberta is:

$A=\frac{h}{2}(B+b)+lw$

Substituting vallues, you get:

$A=(\frac{(410\ mi-180\ mi)}{2})(760\ mi+470\ mi)+(180\ mi)(760\ im)\\\\A=141,450\ mi^2+136,800\ mi^2\\\\A=278,250\ mi^2$

Therefore, the area of of Alberta is about $278,250\ mi^2$ .

5 0

2 years ago

Six friends equally share the cost of a gift. They pay $90 and receive $42 in charge . How much does each friend pay?

sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer:

$8.00

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's set up the equation first.

What do we know:

1. We have 6 friends spliting the costs of the gifts

2. After purchasing the gifts they have $42 in change

3. They originally had $90 to spend.

Equation:

6f + $42 = $90

Next: Subtract the $42 from each side and we are left with:

6f = $48

Divide both sides by 6 and we are left with

f = $8

Since f represented the cost each friend spent our answer is $8.00

3 0

2 years ago

Find the product 9,361×7=

timofeeve [1]

Answer:

65,527

Thank you and please rate me as brainliest as it will help me to level up

5 0

2 years ago

Using identity evaluate: (104)²

SOVA2 [1]

Answer:

104×104=10816

Step-by-step explanation:

104²=104×104

=10816

8 0

1 year ago

George observes that for every increase of 1 in the value of x, there is a increase of 60 in the corresponding value of y. He cl

Brums [2.3K]

Hi there!

FACTS :

To see if multiple ratios are proportional, you can write them as fractions, reduce them, and compare them. If the reduced fractions are all the same, then you have proportionnal ratios. You can also write them as fractions and divide the numerator (top number) by its denominator (bottom number), and compare the decimal numbers the same way you would compare the fractions (I personnaly find this method easier because you don't need to simplify the fractions).

STEPS TO ANSWER:

x = 1 ; y = 90 → $\frac{1}{90} =$ 1 ÷ 90 = 0.01111111...

x = 2 ; y = 150 → $\frac{2}{150} =$ 2 ÷ 150 = 0.0133333...

x = 3 ; y = 210 → $\frac{3}{210} =$ 3 ÷ 210 = 0.01428571

x = 4 ; y = 270 → $\frac{4}{270} =$ 4 ÷ 270 = 0.0148148...

x = 5 ; y = 330 → $\frac{5}{330} =$ 5 ÷ 330 = 0.01515152

** You didn't really need to calculate them all because even the first two decimal numbers weren't equivalent, but I wanted to show you the whole process so I calculated them all.

⇒ If you compare all the decimals you got, you can easily see that they are not the same, which means that the ratios between the values of "x" and the values of "y" are not proportional. Therefore, George's reasoning wasn't good.

There you go! I really hope this helped, if there's anything just let me know! :)

5 0

3 years ago