Guiseppe Garibaldi and Count Camillio Di Cavour were both associated with the Unification of Italy.
In 1861 the Italian states were unified as the Italian kingdom and these two men made it possible. The main reason for their success was that Cavour had the political power and Garibaldi the popular support.
Explanation:
Cant be A because On May 13, 1846 the United States Congress passed An Act providing for the Prosecution of the existing War between the United States and the Republic of Mexico
Can't be B because Mexico did declared a defensive war against the U.S. on April 23, 1846.It would defend territories under the attack but would not take the offensive.
Can't be C because On April 25, 1846, a 2,000-strong Mexican cavalry detachment attacked a 70-man U.S. patrol that had been sent into the contested territory north of the Rio Grande and south of the Nueces River. In the Thornton Affair, the Mexican cavalry routed the patrol, killing 16 American soldiers.
Is D because can't find any information on this and the rest are true.
Hope this helps!! If so please mark brainliest and rate/heart to help my account if it did!!
Answer:
B. The economic ideas expressed in the speech were thought to be
highly popular among likely voters.
Answer: The Hartford Convention resulted in a declaration calling on the Federal Government to protect New England and to supply financial aid to New England's badly battered trade economy.
According to Al Bakri, Kumbi Saleh (Ghana) consisted of two towns. In one town lived the arabs, it held twelve mosquets and numerous wells of sweet water. In this town lived learned men, as well as jurists and religious men. Six miles away laid the city where the king lived (Al Ghaba), in a palace surrounded by a defensive wall.
Only the king and his heir could wear sewn clothes and other accessories, signs of wealth, while the common people that followed his religion could only dress with simplicity, shaving their beards and hair. The king's way of living would exude power, wealth and magnificence, and his followers could only show humility by kneeling and sprinting their heads with dust. While the arabs would greet him by clapping.
As I understand it, the customs in arab lands were much more equal, there were not big social differences between its inhabitants. In the other part of the city, this was not the case, there would be big social differences between the king and its followers, that the author doesn't name bi its etniciti, nationality or religion. They were just the followers of the king.
