1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
2 years ago
14

Were the new Latin American nations better off as independent states than they had been under colonial rule? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
Sindrei [870]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:While Brazil maintained its territorial integrity after independence, the former Spanish America split into more than a dozen separate countries, following the administrative divisions of the colonial system. The difficulty for the inhabitants of these units was not, however, as simple as the demarcation of geographic boundaries. Rather, the recently emancipated countries of Latin America faced the much more daunting challenge of defining and consolidating new nations.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the postal worker's authority?
vivado [14]
What do you mean? Could you be more specific?
5 0
3 years ago
Some historians argue that the nature of slavery and the debates over slavery in the united states dramtically changed between 1
Oduvanchick [21]

The debate over slavery in the United States did not start with the Constitutinal Convention during 1787. However, it was known that the issue first came to the fore. There were different commitment to this idea, some northerns did not like it, but the southerners agreed to it. It was obvious that compromise was needed for the Constitution to be established. An <span>arrangement was written in to the Constitution by which for voting purposes slaves would be counted as three-fifths (3/5s) of a person. </span>

8 0
3 years ago
Hey will anyone be kind Enough to help me with my history test plz :)
il63 [147K]
How would you like help?
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was meant to give common people more rights?
madreJ [45]
The answer to the first question is "A, Petition of Right" 
The answer to the second question is "B, The Stuarts" 
6 0
3 years ago
What did the Treaty of Versailles mean for Germany and for Europe?
Kryger [21]


For Germany the treat of Versailles dealt them a heavy hand. They were imposed land, economic and military restraints as well as forced to pay a great deal of the reparations cost for countries like France. Whom during world war one had received heavy damages.

More specific on territory, Germany's land were split between different nations. Such as the Rhineland  which they were prohibited from occupying after losing the war.

Hope it somewhat helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Because _______ felt strongly about america's membership in the league of nations, he could not compromise with the senate.
    6·1 answer
  • Where did god lead abraham and his people
    7·2 answers
  • Why did Metacom declare war on the English colonists?
    6·1 answer
  • How were the new research universities of the late 19th century different from earlier colleges?
    8·1 answer
  • The American colonists became more and more unhappy with British rule in the years leading up to the American Revolution. Which
    13·2 answers
  • Which of these individuals were proponents of christianity? select all that apply
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the wall street crash
    10·1 answer
  • New netherland governor who refused to surrender to England
    15·1 answer
  • What was "Reconstruction" in regard to the civil war?
    9·1 answer
  • How were the lives of wealthy women different from those of other women in Arab society?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!