I believe it’s ashland and mineral
Answer:
Thomas Gibbons won the case Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824 because he <em><u>held a federal license to do business.</u></em>
Explanation:
The Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. Ogden was a case of a territorial issue where the two parties tried to gain superior authority over the rights involved. This court case set the precedent for how state and federal powers are entertained.
Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons were former partners in the steamboat industry. So, when Gibbons got his own steamboat to operate, the issue of who can ply in the waterways became an issue. Ogden has a state permit while Gibbons's was a federal permit.
When Gibbons operates his steamboat on the waterways of New York, Ogden opposed, claiming that Gibbons has no permit. This case became a fight between the state and federal powers, with the issue of who was to have a higher power. And the court agreed or dictated that the federal government has control or precedence over the state.
So, <u>Gibbons won the case because of his federal licence against Ogden's state licence</u>.
The five terms of the compromise of 1850 includes:
- Missouri was admitted as a slave state
- California was admitted to the Union as a free state
- a stringent fugitive slave law was passed
- Texas was paid by the federal government for the territory given to new mexico.
- the slave trade was outlawed in the district of Columbia.
<h3>What is the
compromise of 1850?</h3>
This is the Compromise that consists of five laws passed in 1850 to dealt with the issue of slavery and territorial expansion.
On of its significance was when California requested permission to enter the Union as a free state which upsetted the balance between the free and slave states in the U.S. Senate.
Read more about compromise of 1850
<em>brainly.com/question/863705</em>
#SPJ1