All categories

3 years ago

2. What problems do for-private prisons bring up for Latinos in the criminal justice system.

Law

1 answer:

7nadin3 [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

High rates of violence.
High employee turnover.
Lack of qualified employees.
Lack of training for employees.
High economic expenditure.

Explanation:

Private prisons are institutions that confine criminals and are, in most cases, used by state governments through contracts with those governments. These contracts may cover the entire presidency or only part of it.

This type of prison presents a great economic expense in relation to the lack of infrastructure and qualified professionals it presents. This allows the rate of violence between detainees and between staff and detainees to be very high, in addition to compromising rights and fair treatment among detainees.

You might be interested in

The Court of Justice acts as:_____.

Anna11 [10]

Hmmm thinking ???? Just one moment

5 0

3 years ago

When might anarchy be effective

mylen [45]

Answer:

Anarchism is a belief that society should have no government, laws, police, or any other authority. Having that belief is perfectly legal, and the majority of anarchists in the U.S. advocate change through non-violent, non-criminal means.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

PLS Important, 2 questions

Mama L [17]

Answer:

3 basic rights.

1.Religious freedom

2. Freedom of speach

3. Freedom of the press

Explanation:

All of our rights even inalianable rights come with limits.

The only right that has no limits is the freedom of thought which is the same as religious freedom. You have the right to think and believe anything. But even that has restrictions on how you can act on your beliefs. Your religious beliefs are not a license to do anything related to that belief. You can't engage in human sacrifice as a ritual for the belief. You can't hide behind your religous beliefs as a sheild against prosecution for murder.

"Freedom of religion embraces two concepts, -freedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the nature of things the second cannot be. ~ <em>Cantwell v Connecticut.</em>

<em />

The freedom of speach also has limits. You can say anything but you can't yell fire in a crowded theater. Doing so could cause a stampede and endanger the lives of others. Likewise, we have an impeachment case before the Senate right now in which the former president incited a riot at the Capital complex that caused the death of 6 people. The question before the Senate is did the former President incite a riot causing death and destruction of public property?

The freedom of the press is a first amendment right. But that doesn't give a publisher the right to slander or print falsehood about another person. The freedom of assembly is another 1st amendment right, but there is a difference between a lawful and peaceful assembly and a riot that results in the death of 5 people and the destruction of property.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Sara does not often ask questions about her father's past. He emigrated to the United States and tells her that the man he was b

Katarina [22]

Answer:

C. Japanese Yakusa

Explanation:

Yakuza adopt samurai-like rituals and often bear elaborate body tattoos.

4 0

3 years ago

What is the primary responsibility of United States Attorneys?

skad [1K]

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

prosecute cases on behalf of the federal government

5 0

2 years ago