One-party systems are often associated with dictators, whether they are "good" or "bad." Most dictatorships allow only one party, which totally controls the government.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that </span></span>"Leaders of both cultures used a system to control society" would be the best option, since this is how they regulated things like commerce and trade
The 24 amendment <span>of the </span>United States Constitution<span> prohibits both </span>Congress<span> and the </span>states<span> from conditioning the right to vote in </span>federal elections<span> on payment of a </span>poll tax<span> or other types of tax. The amendment was proposed by Congress to the states on August 27, 1962, and was </span>ratified<span> by the states on January 23, 1964.</span>
I believe the answer is: The Sacco and Vanzetti Trial and sentencing
In 1921, Sacco and Vanzetti were sentenced to death by the court for their crime. Many people said that the sentencing was driven by anti-immigrant bias. But the court had a really strong evidence that both of them were committing first-degree murder. So it is unlikely that the decision was influenced by nationalism.
