The Right Response is Option C which is Long Term Changes in the Economy.
<h3><u>
Why Did Friedman Argued So?</u></h3>
- The concept of monetarism, which refers to the management of money in the economy, was developed by Milton Friedman. According to Friedman, changes in the money supply can have both long- and short-term consequences.
Friedman suggested that long-term changes in the economy had an impact on consumer behavior. Long-term economic developments have an impact on how consumers behave while making purchases. For instance, if long-term economic trends are favorable, consumer spending will rise; otherwise, it would fall.
Therefore, "long-term changes in the economy" is the right response.
To learn more about Long Term Changes in the Economy. Click the links.
brainly.com/question/20822981
#SPJ4
Correct Question - Milton Friedman argued that consumers are more likely to alter their behavior based on
a) changes in the unemployment rate.
b) short-term changes in the economy.
c) long-term changes in the economy.
d) changes in the inflation rate.
Answer:
The correct answer that fills the gaps are: constant
; increasing.
Explanation:
GDP per capita, income per capita or income per capita is an economic indicator that measures the relationship between the level of income of a country and its population. For this, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of said territory is divided by the number of inhabitants.
The use of per capita income as an indicator of wealth or economic stability of a territory makes sense because through its calculation national income is interrelated (through GDP in a specific period) and the inhabitants of this place.
The objective of GDP per capita is to obtain data that somehow shows the level of wealth or well-being of that territory at a given time. It is often used as a measure of comparison between different countries, to show differences in economic conditions.
Answer:
2.41%
Explanation:
The difference between the two firms' ROEs is shown below:-
Particulars Firm HD Firm LD
Assets $200 Debt ratio 50% Debt ratio 30%
EBIT $40 Interest rate 12% Interest rate 10%
Tax rate 35%
Debt $100 $60
Interest $12 $6
($100 × 12%) ($60 × 10%)
Taxable income $28 $36
($40- $12) ($40 - $6)
Net income $18.2 $22.1
$28 × (1 - 0.35) $36 × (1 - 0.35)
Equity $100 $140
($200 - $100) ($200 - $60)
ROE 18.2% 15.79%
($18.2 ÷ $100) ($22.1 ÷ $140)
Taxable income = EBIT - Interest
Net income = Income - Taxable income
Equity = Assets - Debt
ROE = Net income ÷ Equity
Difference in ROE = ROE Firm HD - ROE Firm LD
= 18.2% - 15.79%
= 2.41%
So, for computing the difference between the two firms' ROEs we simply deduct the ROE firm LD from ROE firm HD.
Laissez faire model was inspired by John Stuart Mill's book "Principles of Political Economy" (1848). This model states that the government should not be heavily involved in the market, and should have a hands off approach.
I hope this helped! :)
managers can choose between three possible global ______, which range from selling the same product to introducing an entirely new product
