1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kazeer [188]
2 years ago
6

SOMEONE HELP!!!??? ASAP! I’ll give you brainliest...

History
1 answer:
FromTheMoon [43]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Well I say yes because if you are being racist to someone you are basically telling your opinion about them and their race but in a rude manner.

Explanation:

Please give branilest :)

You might be interested in
Why do you think the outcome of the french and Indian war was significant
Leviafan [203]
It gave british more land therefore more power., forced the frech into canda and the indian(native americans) into the west
7 0
3 years ago
What are three ways interchangeable parts change work?
svetlana [45]
During the Industrial Revolution of the 19th century, machines took over most of the manufacturing work from men, and factories replaced craftsmen’s workshops. The event that laid the groundwork for this monumental change was the introduction of interchangeable parts, or pre-manufactured parts that were for all practical purposes identical, into the firearms industry. Interchangeable parts, popularized in America when Eli Whitney used them to assemble muskets in the first years of the 19th century, allowed relatively unskilled workers to produce large numbers of weapons quickly and at lower cost, and made repair and replacement of parts infinitely easier.
4 0
3 years ago
What does the acronym WHO stand for?
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

<em>WHO = World Health Organization </em>

3 0
2 years ago
The case of Sweatt v. Painter (1950) represented the NAACP’s attempt to focus on segregation in which area?
MakcuM [25]

Answer:

B) Public education

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Why did many Americans wish to remain neutral and not take sides in the growing conflicts in Europe
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

The reason why the Americans wanted to remain neutral and not take sides in the growing conflicts in Europe is because we simply didn't want to get in war that isn't our fight neither want to send troops to Europe and fight over there and waist tax payers money instead use it and others ways. Its like two people arguing because usually people let the other two argue and dont interfere because they dont want to get caught up in it and its not their problem.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • HOW many years did W l last?
    9·2 answers
  • The current structure of middle eastern geography and political rule is a direct result of nineteenth century european imperial
    14·1 answer
  • What constitutional principle prohibits an individual state from declaring war?l
    12·1 answer
  • The Constitutional Convention of 1787 People representing all states but Rhode Island came to Philadelphia for a special meeting
    15·1 answer
  • The Food and Nutrition Service is part of _____.
    10·2 answers
  • What events lead to the civil war
    14·1 answer
  • Identify whether each feature describes the British or French colonies.
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Which industries had the greatest impact on westward expansion and why? You can consider mining, logging, or any of the indus
    14·2 answers
  • How did the monarchs of Europe react to the French Revolution?
    15·2 answers
  • Please help im on a timer :)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!