1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lerok [7]
3 years ago
5

Which of these is not something soldiers were expected to do when they were not fighting or migrating to another location?

History
1 answer:
seraphim [82]3 years ago
5 0

<em> A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.</em>

<em>When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.</em>

<em>The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).</em>

<em>Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.</em>

<em>Hope this helps.</em>

<em>-Northstar</em>

You might be interested in
Describe in a essay what the "rule of law" ment to the avreage roman
defon

Answer:

discipline both at home and in the militar y was paramount to rome's successes

8 0
3 years ago
What made the Dred Scott case a significant one in American history?
Grace [21]
The answer is d they denied him his rights and told him that someones property cannot sue and said that just because he lived in a free state doesnt make him free
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the late 1800s, where did Chinese find work once they arrived to the West Coast?
kkurt [141]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
As a result of state-Owned collective farms in the Soviet Union, during the Great Depression,
Ket [755]

The correct answer is A) A. Soviet suffered a far greater economic crisis than Germany.

As a result of state-Owned collective farms in the Soviet Union, during the Great Depression, Soviet suffered a far greater economic crisis than Germany.

Since the early 1930s, the Soviet Union implemented a policy of collectivization in the agriculture industry, when Premier Joseph Stalin became the leader of Russia. In 1932, Stalin started the 5-year economic plan aimed to improve the economy in the country. The idea was to integrate the land of private owners into an agriculture system controlled by the state.

8 0
3 years ago
Why is the person holding the cross standing over the Bible? The person is a former religious leader. The person is against reli
Furkat [3]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same cartoon that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be "</span><span>The cartoon is showing the man as a demagogue" since he is ultimately mocking Christianity. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • which action best illustrates the cold war policy of containment? 1)participating in the Nuremberg trials 2) creating of NATO 3)
    7·1 answer
  • Explain how imperial bureacucy/metricotcy works​
    13·1 answer
  • Which term is used for “a community of people that shares territory and a government”?
    9·1 answer
  • Select the items that are considered low risk investments. Stocks, bonds, or bank accounts?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST explains why United States entered World War I in 1917?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the Federal mailing act
    11·1 answer
  • How did the great awakening and the enlightenment influence colonial society??
    7·2 answers
  • Which european country was the first to move away from absolute monarchy?
    11·2 answers
  • Hi can someone plsss help me with this!!
    9·1 answer
  • Please help with the first question I’m SUPERRRRR confused what to write!
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!