Most of the whole point was that the masters could keep them in debt as long as they wanted, and not let them keep the land. People who participated in this system could get out of debt by <span>fleeing to the north and west to leave their debts behind.
Have a nice day! :)</span>
The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Explanation
Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.
Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Answer:
1. Fredrick Douglas, Maria Stewart, David Ruggles, and Phillip Bell
Explanation:
1. Abolitionists tried to abolish slavery (hence the name) and some of them used violence. Garnet made a famous speech called "Address to the Slaves" (1843) and later Fredrick Douglas joined Maria Stewart, David Ruggles, and Phillip Bell, who all used force.
Sorry, this was the only one I could answer. I hope this helped.
