Maybe it means that there’s a difference between how much land they own or something. It says there was a difference between the amount of land they occupied and the amount of land they couldn’t control. So maybe they didn’t own/have a lot of land but there was a lot of land they couldn’t get to/take over etc. or maybe this situation could be vice versa so they have a ton of land but only a little isn’t “controlled” let me know if this helps sorry if it’s confusing I’m just guessing based on the context clues :)
Answer:
A, there really isn't a lot of info but that's what I would pick
Answer: 1) Formal amendments may be proposed by a 2/3 vote of each house of Congress and be ratified by 3/4 of the state legislatures, 2) proposed by Congress and then ratified by conventions, called for that purpose, in 3/4 of the states, 3) proposed by a national conventions called by Congress at the request for 2/3 of the state legislatures and be ratified by 3/4 of the state legislatures, and 4) may be proposed by a national convention and ratified by Conventions in 3/4 of the states.
Explanation: (from quizlet)
Answer:
The Cold War is so important a part of American history because it so directly affected the United States and because the United States was one of two major global powers involved in a protracted stand-off the consequences of which could have been nuclear war and the deaths of hundreds of millions of people. That is pretty significant.
Have a good day,
#ViolentJax
The motivation for Luther's 95 theses was the selling of indulgences. So, it would be D
