I think you forgot to give the options along with the question. I am answering the question based on my knowledge and research. "The Supreme Court rules on a case" would be the event that <span>happens last in the appeals process. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your desired help.</span>
He could use the crop rotation system.
Abolitionists wanted the Dred Scott case to be heard by the courts because this would bring slavery to the forefront and Congress would be forced to deal with the issue. Why? Well, see below for an explanation!
Let’s start by addressing what the Dred Scott case was and how it affected former slaves and blacks as a whole. The Dred Scott v. Sanford case was a situation that occurred during the times of slavery (year of 1857). Dred Scott’s slave owner passed away and Scott offered that he buy his freedom. The Chief Justice in court at the time sought an opportunity to settle that blacks were inferior. When the case was heard in Supreme Court, the ruling came out explicitly that black people were inferior and had no rights as far as the white man. Under these circumstances, it was implied that Dred Scott could not purchase his freedom as could a white man. Abolitionists also saw this as an opportunity though because they wanted the conflict of slavery to be addressed publicly and with a straightforward response/resolution. If you need any extra help, let me know and I will gladly assist you.
Answer:
got 100 percent by useing this
Explanation:
Specifically, economists may analyze issues such as consumer demand and sales to help a company maximize its profits. Economists also work for international organizations, research firms, and think tanks, where they study and analyze a variety of economic issues.
Answer:
The answer is B and F
Explanation:
External and internal forces weakened the empire
Famine swept through the region
