The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.
<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>
Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.
Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.
They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.
Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.
#SPJ1
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "FALSE." Breach of contract lawsuits can occur ONLY when the problem exists between two parties, but no more. It is false that breach of contract lawsuits can occur only when the problem exists between 2 parties, but no more, since these can involve multiple parties.
A-A. The case upheld a state’s right to ignore federal legislation in regards to banking practices.
Women were mostly housewives. Their job was to take care of the house and to raise children. If they were rich, however, or if they were nobility, then they could participate in politics or popular activities or things like that, but the common people had to be housewives.
