1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Simora [160]
3 years ago
7

What was the reasoning for forcibly removing Japanese Americans from their home following the surprise attack at Pearl Harbor? S

hare your opinion about Japanese internment. Necessary? Constitutional?
History
1 answer:
katen-ka-za [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

America forcibly removed Japanese Americans following the attack on Pearl Harbor because there was a risk of Japanese spying. America had to ramp up production on almost everything during WWII, and in the event that there were Japanese spies, they could report all our weak and vulnerable points back to Japan. The Internment was, in my opinion, necessary. National security is not something the take lightly. If Japan knew all our vulnerabilities, they could have crippled us. The constitution, if I recall right, doesn't say anything about not being able to relocate a certain mass of people.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Read this excerpt from "Just Another Sunday."
Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

I think the answer is B. The fast pace moves the story forward to reveal Jay's transformation.

I am not 100% sure so, tell me if i'm wrong please.

Explanation:

The excerpt shows, or says the transformation of Jay, so I was assuming the answer is B. The excerpt also goes a in a kinda fast pace.

3 0
3 years ago
Which best describes “the mission” <br><br> A<br> B<br> C<br> D
pav-90 [236]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why is it important for an Info tech <br> specialists to be systematic
maksim [4K]
So they can keep track of their work
8 0
3 years ago
Migrants from which Asian nation came in large numbers to participate in the gold rush and settlement of the west ?
Viefleur [7K]
Migrants from China came in large numbers to participate in the gold rush.
7 0
3 years ago
…Whenever the legislators [lawmakers] try to take away, and destroy the property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery und
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

People have the right to stop doing what the government says.

Explanation:

According to the text, when the legislators of a region take maleficent attitudes to the people, such as destroying the people's property, taking away all their autonomy and placing them as slaves, the legislators promote the existence of civil disobedience. This is because, since the people are hurt by their legislators, the people have the complete right to fight back and refuse to do what the government determines.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In which way is the US government similar to the ancient Roman government?
    7·1 answer
  • Please please help I’m in a really big hurry please
    12·1 answer
  • What were the three lasting contributions of the ancient Phoenicians
    5·2 answers
  • What happened to the Underground Railroad after the Fugitive Slave Act was passed?
    7·1 answer
  • A central aspect of early Roman conquest was that all conquered peoples
    7·2 answers
  • What are examples of powers of a state government
    14·2 answers
  • Which are the most dominant colonies—and why? How do the colonies compare to one<br> another?
    12·1 answer
  • When scientists analyzed drilling samples from the Glomar Challenger study, which discovery did they make about rocks in relatio
    6·2 answers
  • Help! Lost on what this could be
    10·2 answers
  • 1. Which side did the<br> United States support,<br> and why?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!