Explanation:
1. I <u>agree </u>with the Sitting Bull's quote. It makes me feel a bit upset, Sitting Bull conveyed great emotion within the 8 sentence that are there.
2. I do <u>not </u>think western settlers could have coexisted with tribes they encountered due to how persistent Sitting Bull was for fighting for the Native American's freedom from the Western Settlers.
3. I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have been put on reservations. The Native Americans were there before the Western Settlers were, this is their land.
4. No, I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have adapted to settler ways. Native Americans have their own culture which the settlers should not intervene with.
5. The settlers and federal government was <u>not</u> within their rights to conquer Native Americans and take their homelands. The Native Americans have their own rights just as much the settlers did. The homelands were where they lived. They were not above the Native Americans.
The answer would be C. because the colonies were created for 1. the motherlands to get richer off the natural resources and 2 the places were getting crowded with debtors.
Jim Crow laws kept african americans from going to movies, playing with kids of another race, different schools, and african americans got beaten aplenty
In his 2008 article for the New York Times, James Gleick talks about "the gloom that has fallen over the book-publishing industry" to describe the the negative impact of digitalizing books in the book-publishing industry.
In this article he describes the already decline in paper-books sales due to the rise of digital platforms such as Kindle, epub, etc, and how the future of book-publishers looked grimer because of an agreement between authors, publishers and Google to allow the scanning and digitalizing of books to make them accesible in website and digital platforms.
This agreement would be dramatic for the sectors of the book-publishing industry dealing with marketing, archiving and distributing physical paper books.
