1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetach [21]
3 years ago
13

In 1095 at Clermont, Pope Urban II:

History
1 answer:
vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago
8 0
Im sure It is B :) hope it helps
You might be interested in
Chief Justice John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that the Cherokee were a sovereign
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer: Despite the ruling of the Supreme Court that the Cherokee was a sovereign nation, the forcible removal of the Cherokee was carried out by the state of Georgia. The Cherokee however argued that they had negotiated treaties with the United State federal government that had granted them the rights to these lands. The Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee were a separate, independent nation with a right to retain their lands. President Jackson did not however enforce the court decision, and the state of Georgia continue the policy of removing them from their own land.

4 0
3 years ago
Which two trends in the 1990's were changes implemented by U.S. Business?
stepladder [879]
Im pretty sure the answer is C because a lot of companies were still downsizing
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is it important to think about the motivations of a source?
igor_vitrenko [27]
To see if they are trying to provide bias or persuade or be one-sided in their claims. Also to know what was their purpose of providing the evidence was for. The author put in the time and effort to create the source so what was his end goal to accomplish for the reader.
8 0
3 years ago
Give some examples of religious intolerance that groups such as Catholics or Jewish people faced in the 19th century in the Unit
frez [133]

Answer:

is a grate question thah you did/

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
WAS THE BOSTON TEA PARTY MORALLY JUSTIFIED?
Igoryamba

Answer:

1. Yes

Explanation: British were bad to the Colonists, the British took over the homes of the colonists. And the British wanted to fight and take over the country they found.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is not a way that interest group achieve their goal
    15·1 answer
  • What is significant about prime Minister Manmohan Singh being a Sikh ?
    10·1 answer
  • The U.S. Congress passes a bill outlining a new national education law. What source of law does this scenario describe? Constitu
    6·2 answers
  • The constitution gives congress a list of ____<br> A <br> Power <br> B <br> Decision
    5·2 answers
  • Nothing is good or bad, but it is<br>our thinking which makes it so.​
    11·1 answer
  • Why does randolph think civil rights are not enough to secure freedom
    9·1 answer
  • An effect of the steamboat’s popularity was that...
    7·2 answers
  • All of the following men negotiated the treaty of 1783 except:
    7·1 answer
  • During the Middle Ages, the Church provided a sense of
    10·1 answer
  • What challenges did Europe to the muslim world ​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!