1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bess [88]
2 years ago
6

How could U.S. national interests lead to potential conflicts with other countries?

Law
2 answers:
Aloiza [94]2 years ago
6 0

Answer: This relates to the idea of realism

Explanation:

Less trade deals= economic conflict

Less foreign aid=politcal conflict

Less international work equals cold relationships with other countries could damage vital relationships especially with those the U.S. needs for resources such as Saudi Arabia for oil.

hammer [34]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The U.S. national interests could lead to conflict because frankly we are the world superpower, dominating in most aspects of trade and good, and for a small country like Pakistan to sell us oil, that would mean lots of money for them. What comes with the responsibility of earning our money also comes with competition with neighboring countries over the privilege to sell us oil.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
On Election Day, which Poll Worker position is responsible for the setup and breakdown of the EViD?
Liula [17]

Answer:

The Insepctor

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Constitution as source of law justify it​
deff fn [24]
The Custom as a source of law is very important in all legal systems because it is beyond doubt that they appeared before the law. They came with the society. They are regarded as the founding stone of the legal system and basis of law. ... Customs consists of rules of conduct which are generally observed
6 0
2 years ago
What are the three arguments concerning the Integration angle in Affirmative Action? (Name all three and explain)
snow_tiger [21]

Answer Integration angle just means peoples perspective on integration!

Explanation:

I had a little trouble reading this so I apologize if it's not correct!

Try rewording the question as: What are 3 arguments people make against integration when it comes to affirmative action?

I sadly do not know the 3 arguments regarding integration in affirmative action, but I hope the way I reworded the question helps! The term "integration angle" is rather confusing.

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding Supreme Court Justices?
Nina [5.8K]

D.) Most justices are communist kikes, and if not, are obedient to jews.

3 0
2 years ago
11. During the debate over the Constitution and whether to add a Bill of Rights, what would’ve been the point of view of an anti
dmitriy555 [2]
It would be the last choice.
Anti-Federalists feared a strong federal government and were worried about their rights therefore, they thought that a Bill of Rights was necessary.
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Probable Cause Panel of FREC acts as a grand jury. They determine if there is a law violation or not and they recommend whet
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the difference between a voluntary and involuntary placement.
    13·2 answers
  • Community oriented policing vocabulary
    12·1 answer
  • In general, how has the power of the federal and the state governments changed over the course of the country's
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the dark figure of crime and it's importance in understanding crime
    6·1 answer
  • The
    14·1 answer
  • What is required for the establishment of stare decisis as a legal principle?
    12·1 answer
  • What methods have unions historically used to obtain their goals?​
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the ways a citizen can participate in the affairs of their country​
    7·1 answer
  • To provide legal advice to the public is to engage in
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!