Answer:
Federal Judges are appointed for life because that is how it was written into the US Constitution. ... The writers of the Constitution gave federal judges job security because they wanted judges to be able to decide cases free from public or political pressures.
I believe if the are underange he may be forced unless certain situations things like joint custody might come into play. joint physical custody is where a court orders a child to spend a substantial amount of time with both parents during the course of the year. Second, joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters. Lastly, both joint physical and legal custody is a combination of the first two. IT IS ULTIMATELY up to the court to decide whether any type of joint custody is in the best interests of a child. If not, the parent with primary custodial rights over a child will get to decide what kind of visitation for the other parent is fair and reasonable. In many situations, this works out well for both parents and they can often come to an amicable arrangement regarding visitation hours and days.
Answer: States within the United States of America to obey the laws and public acts other other states.
Explanation: The full faith and credit clause of the United States of America constitution is contained in Article four, section one. This clause requires the various United States of America to obey and respects the legal judgements,the public acts and records of other states of the Federation. The full faith and credit clause is essential to the survival and sustainance of the unity of the United States of America,as it helps to create unity and ensures that states help and support each other to effectively executive both criminal activities and other strategic Activities.
Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
Answer:
It requires sufficient evidence before moving to trial in cases of serious crimes.
Explanation:
As you may already know the court by Jurí is responsible for judging malicious crimes against life. In this type of court, it is up to a popular panel - the jury drawn to make up the sentencing council - to declare whether the crime in question has happened and whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. This type of trial is very important and protects the rights of the accused, as the case must be explained to the jury in a very detailed manner, explaining all the evidence. Thus, it is more difficult for the accused to be unjustly convicted.
