Answer:
I don't know the answer of this but plz mark me as a brainliest
Based on the analysis, Joe did pick Action B ( where Joe has a good time playing ball, he feels guilty about breaking his promise and Kat finds out that Joe lied, and Joe's friendship with her suffers because it is the option that has lesser consequences.
When you look at the situation of Joe in terms of Egoist Analysis, he has the self interest to play ball with his friends and also pick up Kat but also he shifted to the use of utilitarian in basing his judgment.
This is not because of his self interest but because his friend is moving out of town and that would be the last time they ever play together.
He look at the option that has more consequences (collective baseball friends he will disappoint if he did not go) and just one friend who he can see later and explain reasons to.
<h3>What is the role of egoism and utilitarianism?</h3>
The word egoism is known to center around the psychological theory that deals with the nature of human motives.
Psychological egoism is one that state that all behaviors are said to be influenced by self-interest. In other words, it suggests that every That is any action or behavior or decision of all is due to our self interest.
Utilitarianism is known to be a theory that deals with morality. It is one that stands for any actions that result in happiness or pleasure and is one that is against any actions that cause unhappiness or harm.
Learn more about egoist from
brainly.com/question/13721004
Answer:
meeeeeeeehwjjwhqkqhkqjqkqjjq
Answer:
It held that the defendants, My Web, with respect to the fraud allegations against them, had satisfied minimum contacts.
Explanation:
In the civil procedure law of the United States, minimum contacts is a legal term used to assert jurisdiction of a state court over a defendant which is from another state. By marketing its products in Idaho through its website, from where the company Blimka was able to place the order for jeans, My Web's activities provided the basis to establish minimum contacts, thus allowing the court in Idaho to assert jurisdiction. This falls under the Internet Activities portion.
COMPLETE QUESTION:
Which of the following is needed to prove that there is defamation as is suggested by Shelly and Tony?
a. That Mrs. Vogel made a false statement of a fact.
b. That Mrs. Vogel harmed the reputation of the car dealership.
c. That the statement was published to at least one person, other than those who worked at the car dealership.
d. All of these choices are needed.
Answer: d.) All of these choices are needed.
Explanation:
Culled from Constitutional Issues:
All of the stated options or are needed to prove that there is defamation as is suggested by Shelly and Tony. Hence, the correct answer is (d.)