The Government regulate natural monopolies by <u>A.) ensuring and overseeing one supplier</u>, because a natural monopoly occurs when in an industry the fixed costs are too higher, so is very difficult that more than one business start activities in that industry, for that reason <u>only can exist one competitor or one supplier</u>, as an example of that are the public utilities as water or electricity.
Moreover, due to in the natural monopolies don't exist competitors in the same industry, the suppliers in those monopolies could abuse of their advantage and their market position by establishing higher costs to customers, <u>so with the purpose to prevent that possible unjust actions, the Government regulate the natural monopolies by ensuring and supervising constantly to the only supplier of an specific industry.</u>
There are scientific sources that affirm that communism is the extreme form of socialism, others affirm that after the Second World War, socialism appeared as a transformed form of communism.
Now, in terms of the economic focus of both we have;
COMMUNISM:
<em>The goods of production are handled by all, that is to say that the concept of property within the goods of production is annulled.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The production is related only to meet human needs, without the need for money.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Look for the condition in which material abundance exists.
</em>
SOCIALISM:
<em>The means of production are from public companies or cooperatives.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Individuals are compensated according to the principle of individual contribution.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Production can be coordinated by economic planning or economic markets.</em>
Answer:
B)
Explanation:
all people should evaluate media messeges for accuracy and balance.
hope this helped. : )
Answer:
b. Restrict first amendment rights.
Explanation:
The Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case ruled by putting limitations on the rights of individuals if it concerns the interest of the nation. This ruling states that constitutional rights are not absolute and can be changed anytime the government sees fit.
The Supreme Court decided to issue the limits on the freedoms of individuals, especially during wartime. This ruling established the ability of the government in suppressing any speech or news that it thinks is harmful to the welfare of the nation. It stated that with concerns regarding the <em>"clear and present danger" </em>that can put the nation in jeopardy, the government is free to restrict the first amendment rights as and when it feels necessary.
Thus, the correct answer is option b.
