Answer:
x=49
Step-by-step explanation:
2(3x+1)=3(2−x)
Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.
2(3x+1)=3(2−x)
(2)(3x)+(2)(1)=(3)(2)+(3)(−x)(Distribute)
6x+2=6+−3x
6x+2=−3x+6
Step 2: Add 3x to both sides.
6x+2+3x=−3x+6+3x
9x+2=6
Step 3: Subtract 2 from both sides.
9x+2−2=6−2
9x=4
Step 4: Divide both sides by 9.
9x9=49
x=49
Sorry it's a bit messy. but I hope you understand and it will help
Answer is Mary because
8/8 is a whole
4/8 is a half
3/8 is less than 1/2
Answer:
y = -2.8x +69.4
Step-by-step explanation:
The 2-point form of the equation of a line can be used to find the equation of the line through points (3, 61) and (13, 33). The general form of it is ...
y = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)·(x -x1) +y1
For the given points, this is ...
y = (33 -61)/(13 -3)·(x -3) +61
y = -28/10(x -3) +61
y = -2.8x +69.4 . . . . . the equation of the line through the given points
_____
<em>Comment on the problem</em>
A "line of best fit" is one that minimizes some measure of deviation from the line. Usually, what is minimized is the square of the deviations. Choosing two points to draw the line through may be convenient, but does not necessarily result in a line of best fit.
<h3>
Answer: Choice A) 212 square meters</h3>
========================================================
Explanation:
14.10 has four sig figs. The 0 at the end is significant. This measurement is accurate to the hundredths place. If the author wrote 14.1, then it would be accurate to the tenths place with three sig figs.
15.0 has three sig figs. The 0 is significant. If they wrote 15 or 15. then we'd be dealing with 2 sig figs instead; however they placed the 0 there to tell the reader "this measurement is accurate to the tenths place"
---------------------
Multiply the values given
14.10*15.0 = 211.5
Round that to three sig figs. We pick the smaller sig fig count to round to since we cannot be certain it is accurate to four sig figs. In a sense, we pick the weakest link and use that to determine rounding when it comes to multiplication and division.
This means 211.5 rounds to 212
