1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lapo4ka [179]
3 years ago
13

. G: The 20% discount on a $55 sweatshirt

Mathematics
1 answer:
amid [387]3 years ago
8 0

If there is a 20% discount on a $55 sweatshirt, that sweatshirt would now only cost $44.

Answer: $44

Also: The 20% is $11

You might be interested in
8≥x+4>5 i need answer
dexar [7]

Answer:

1 < x ≤ 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

8 ≥ x + 4 > 5 ( subtract 4 from each of the 3 intervals )

4 ≥ x > 1

Hence

1 < x ≤ 4

3 0
4 years ago
The function f (x comma y )equals 3 xy has an absolute maximum value and absolute minimum value subject to the constraint 3 x sq
zmey [24]

Answer:

The maximum value of f is 363, which is reached in (11,11) and (-11,-11) and the minimum value of f is -33, which is reached in (√11,-√11) and (-√11,√11)

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x,y) = 3xy, lets find the gradient of f. First lets compute the derivate of f in terms of x, thinking of y like a constant.

f_x(x,y) = 3y

In a similar way

f_y(x,y) = 3x

Thus,

\nabla{f} = (3y,3x)

The restriction is given by g(x,y) = 121, with g(x,y) = 3x²+3y²-5xy. The partial derivates of g are

[ŧex] g_x(x,y) = 6x-5y [/tex]

g_y(x,y) = 6y - 5x

Thus,

\nabla g(x,y) = (6x-5y,6y-5x)

For the Langrange multipliers theorem, we have that for an extreme (x0,y0) with the restriction g(x,y) = 121, we have that for certain λ,

  • f_x(x_0,y_0) = \lambda \, g_x(x0,y0)
  • f_y(x_0,y_0) = \lambda \, g_y(x_0,y_0)
  • g(x_0,y_0) = 121

This can be translated into

  • 3y = \lambda (6x-5y)
  • 3x = \lambda (-5x+6y)
  • 3 (x_0)^2 + 3(y_0)^2 - 5\,x_0y_0 = 121

If we sum the first two expressions, we obtain

3x + 3y = \lambda (x+y)

Thus, x = -y or λ=3.

If x were -y, then we can replace x for -y in both equations

3y = -11 λ y

-3y = 11 λ y, and therefore

y = 0, or λ = -3/11.

Note that y cant take the value 0 because, since x = -y, we have that x = y = y, and g(x,y) = 0. Therefore, equation 3 wouldnt hold.

Now, lets suppose that λ=3, if that is the case, we can replace in the first 2 equations obtaining

  • 3y = 3(6x-5y) = 18x -15y

thus, 18y = 18x

y = x

and also,

  • 3x = 3(6y-5x) = 18y-15x

18x = 18y

x = y

Therefore, x = y or x = -y.

If x = -y:

Lets evaluate g in (-y,y) and try to find y

g(-y,y) = 3(-y)² + 3y*2 - 5(-y)y = 11y² = 121

Therefore,

y² = 121/11 = 11

y = √11 or y = -√11

The candidates to extremes are, as a result (√11,-√11), (-√11, √11). In both cases, f(x,y) = 3 √11 (-√11) = -33

If x = y:

g(y,y) = 3y²+3y²-5y² = y² = 121, then y = 11 or y = -11

In both cases f(11,11) = f(-11,-11) = 363.

We conclude that the maximum value of f is 363, which is reached in (11,11) and (-11,-11) and the minimum value of f is -33, which is reached in (√11,-√11) and (-√11,√11)

5 0
4 years ago
-0.2×-5/7<br><br>please can i have some help
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

+1/7

Step-by-step explanation:

One approach to evaluating this would be to rewrite it as:

-2        -5  

------ * --------- .  

 10          7   This reduces to:

 2

--------- = +1/7

 2(7)

8 0
4 years ago
John paid $32.16 for groceries. This included 7% sales tax. What was the cost of groceries before the sales tax? A. $2.25 B. $30
hoa [83]
If 32.16 includes the sales tax....then the price before the sales tax will be less then 32.16

that only leaves 2 choices.....
so lets check them...
7% sales tax on 2.25 = 0.07(2.25) = 0.16....so if u spent 2.25 on groceries and added the sales tax of 16 cents....then u would have spent 2.41...thats a long way from 32.16

if u spent 30.06...with 7% sales tax....u would spend 30.06 + 0.07(30.06) = 32.16

so the cost of the groceries before the sales tax is 30.06 <==
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Debbie ate 1/8 of a large brownie. Julian ate 1/2 of a small brownie. Julian says, "I ate more brownies than you because 1/2&gt;
bija089 [108]
True because if you were to do common denominators 1/2 is equivalent to 4/8 and 4/8 is greater than 1/8
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A toy company intends to ship out its entire stock of 10,254 toy trucks, and three times as many toy cars. If each box holds 35
    11·1 answer
  • Find the probability that your friend is at least 20 minutes late
    5·1 answer
  • HELP DUE ON TUESDAY!!
    15·1 answer
  • The weather map shows a zone of possible flash flooding in front of a cold front.
    11·1 answer
  • Uma sala tem o formato de um trapézio, determine a área dessa sala.
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement is best supported by the information in the box plots?
    11·2 answers
  • What is (3+7)x 6+4 using pemdas<br>​
    13·2 answers
  • Find the side lengths the cube X
    10·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP WILL GIVE BRANLEST
    5·2 answers
  • Help asap, rlly need this
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!