Answer:
1. You write your state or federal senator about your idea.
2. Your congressman sponsors a bill.
3. The bill is sent to a Committee for its study.
4. If committee approves of the relevance and usefulness of the bill it is put on a schedule that will define the date when it will be debated, amended if necessary and/or voted.
5. The bill goes to the House for action.
6. If the bill is approved by the vote (simple majority) it is sent to the senate.
7. The bill goes through a similar process in the Senate and may be sent back to the House of Representatives if it has been changed. Then it is voted again by both chambers and sent to the president who will either veto it or sign it into law within ten days.
Both the Senate and the House have to agree on the final version of the bill and it is not uncommon for a bill to go back and forth between both chambers several times
Explanation:
- michelcecilia
It would be called A. predict what happens next.
Date : 25th of November, 2021
Type of Delivery : Audio Recording
File name of the recording : The Metaverse and the Future of Entertainment
<u>Giving a Speech</u>
At some point in everyone's life, they will be called upon or required to address people (an audience). For some, the ability to do this comes very easily. For others, this can be very terrifying. Regardless of which category a person belongs to, practicing a speech for formal purposes is always a very brilliant idea.
<u>Benefits of Practicing one's speech</u>
In addition to building one's confidence, practicing a speech before delivery helps in the following ways:
- gives personal satisfaction
- improves communication skills
- helps to expand professional network
- contributes to personal development
- helps one to gain new social connections
- helps to avoid errors during the speech delivery
For more about speech practice visit the link below:
brainly.com/question/12186336
This should be true. Scientists very often have the idea of self-censure because they understand whether or not their research could be potentially dangerous, for example, if they understand that their creation could be a terrible weapon they decide to not pursue it and abandon the research. Things get nasty when they don't do it, but almost anything can be exploited so they sometimes don't even understand in what ways their research could be exploited. If ideology starts banning scientific research because of ideological differences, then it's similar to how the church killed scientists in the medieval era because scientists opposed what was essentially ideology at the time.
