Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
y > (1/3)x + 4 has an infinite number of solutions. Draw a dashed line representing y = (1/3)x + 4 and then pick points at random on either side of this line. For example, pick (1, 6). Substitute 1 for x in y > (1/3)x + 4 and 6 for y. Is the resulting inequality true? Is 6 > (1/3)(1) + 4 true? YES. So we know that (1, 6) is a solution of y > (1/3)x + 4. Because (1, 6) lies ABOVE the line y = (1/3)x + 4, we can conclude that all points abovve this line are solutions.
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Given :
Years of experience (X) :
1
3
3
5
7
8
10
10
12
12
Annual sales (Y) :
85
97
95
97
105
106
122
120
113
134
The estimated regression equation obtained is :
y = b0 + b1x
b0 = 82.82967
b1 = 3.46061
ŷ = 3.46061X + 82.82967
The change in annual sales for every year of experience is given by the slope value, b1 = 3.46061 = 3.5 (1 decimal place)
The Coefficient of determination R² = 0.8477 = 0.848 ( 3 decimal place).
The Coefficient of determination gives the proportion of explained variance.
About 84.8% percent variation in annual sales can be explained by years of experience of the sales person.
Using the regression equation :
ŷ = 3.46061X + 82.82967
Years of experience, x = 8
ŷ = 3.46061(8) + 82.82967 = 110.514
111 = (to the nearest whole number)
Answer:
G. 105.
Step-by-step explanation:
Percentage of cars with 3 or more people
= 15 + 7 + 3
= 25%,
25% of 420
= 0.25 * 420
= 105.
Answer:
Not correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
x² - 6x - 7 = 0
The following equation can be solved correctly by factoring Thus,
x² - x + 7x - 7 = 0
x(x - 1) +7(x - 1) = 0
(x - 1)(x + 7) = 0
(x - 1) = 0
x - 1 = 0
x - 1 + 1 = 0 + 1
x = 1
Or
(x + 7) = 0
x + 7 = 0
x + 7 - 7 = 0 - 7
x = -7
Therefore, the solution would be x = 1 or x = -7
Lateena solution is therefore NOT CORRECT because she used a wrong method.
