The connotation is that is a symbol of passion and love—this is what the rose represents.
The answer is A, true.
There is a quizlet (search the same question in go0-gle) that mentions this question, I’d suggest to give it a look if you have any problems answering questions.
Paul sets a challenge to “find luck.” Jerry sets a challenges to experience a underwater tunnel. What persuaded Paul is his mom's satisfaction, and for his to house to quit whispering that it needs more cash. Jerry's inspiration is to demonstrate to himself that he can experience the passage. I don't think there are extremely any likenesses, however I think Jerry and Paul's test are generally extraordinary on an individual level. Jerry is more narrow minded than Paul, who, at last, gives his life for his objective.
For Paul the inspiration isn't self-propelled yet determined in a non-coordinate manner by his mom who wishes for more cash and extravagances she can't bear the cost of however wishes she did. For Jerry, it is all self motivational. He drives himself to experience the passage, to figure out how to control his breathing, and forces his mom to purchase goggles for him.
Answer:
I would say to use all the parties involved to shape their experience from a different perspective. The way you shape your perspective can have a big impact on how your reader sees your all-inclusive and overall plot. The author should take part as one of the characters and you should show WHAT happened and you need to establish your perspective uniquely. A key thing is that you want your reader to take away from what you are writing, and the tone of voice you are using. Also for the problem, why was it a problem? Who helped solve or help the problem? If there is a solution, then explain that in detail, and since it is a personal narrative, how do you feel overall from the problem or conflict? I HOPE THIS HELPS, PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG!
This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that only you can complete. However, we are still able to provide some guidance that can help you complete your work.
In her "Letter to Napoleon III," Elizabeth Barrett Browning employs several rhetorical strategies to urge Napoleon III to forgive the author Victor Hugo and free him from his imprisonment.
Browning uses ethos when she presents herself as a fair person. Ethos refers to an appeal to credibility, and Browning employs it when she agrees with Napoleon about the wrong nature of Victor Hugo's actions. She also employs a paradox to force Napoleon to pay close attention to her argument. The paradox is that, even though Victor Hugo acted against the emperor, he deserves to be free. Browning employs anaphora when she repeats the phrase "what touches you" in order to convince Napoleon of the importance of his reputation. Finally, she uses pathos (an appeal to emotion) when she highlights how grateful and admiring Napoleon's subjects will be if he pardons Victor Hugo.
