All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following statements is not correct? Employees have limited protection against surveillance by employers.

Business

1 answer:

babunello [35]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: As with normal first-class mail, employers cannot read employee e-mail."

Explanation:

From the options given, the correct statements are that:

• Employees have limited protection against surveillance by employers.

• The large majority of organizations monitor employee Internet usage.

• The large majority of organizations use URL filtering.

• Employees should be aware that surveillance is legal.

The option that "as with normal first-class mail, employers cannot read employee e-mail" is incorrect. Employers can read the email of their workers.

You might be interested in

Lusk Corporation produces and sells 15,500 units of Product X each month. The selling price of Product X is $25 per unit, and va

Oxana [17]

Answer:

($62,000)

Explanation:

Calculation for the monthly financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company of eliminating this product

Keep Product X Drop Product X Difference

Sales $387,500 $0 $(387,500)

($25 per unit *15,500=$387,500)

Variable expenses $294,500 $0 $294,500

($19 per unit*15,500=$294,500)

Contribution margin $93,000 $0 $(93,000)

Fixed expenses $105,000 $74,000 $31,000

Net operating income (loss)$(12,000)$(74,000)$(62,000)

Therefore the monthly financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company of eliminating this product will be decrease in Net operating amount of ($62,000).

3 0

3 years ago

a manufacturer reports the following costs to produce 11,000 units in its first year of operations: direct materials, $11 per un

DENIUS [597]

The total product cost per unit under absorption costing is: $75.

In absorption costing, the cost of every unit produced is worked out by adding up the direct cost of materials, direct labor, variable overhead, and the fixed overhead. Unlike in the case of marginal costing where the fixed cost is treated as period cost, in absorption costing, fixed cost is treated as a product cost.

The cost per unit

Direct material 28

Direct labor 24

Variable overhead 10

Fixed cost 13

Cost per unit 75

Cost of Inventory

Number of units = 1000

Cost per unit = $75

Value = 1000 * $75 = $75,000

Learn more about absorption costing here:brainly.com/question/26276034

#SPJ4

5 0

1 year ago

Problem Page Watson Company's employees earn $290 per day and are paid on Friday for a five-day work week. This year, December 3

vredina [299]

Answer:

inocme statment:

wages expense: understate

net income overstate

blanace sheet

wages payable: understate

Retained Earnings: overstate

Explanation:

If the adjusting entry is not made, then the expenses will be lower than it should.

Thereofre the net income will be overstate as there are more expenses but weren't recorded.

the balance sheet will not represent accurate the liabilities as there is wages payable which are not recorded.

also, in the blaance sheet the Retained Earnings account will be overstate as it include the net income which is overstate.

5 0

3 years ago

Overhead Applied to Jobs, Departmental Overhead Rates Xania Inc. uses a normal job-order costing system. Currently, a plantwide

sveta [45]

Answer:

Instructions are listed below.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Department A Department B

Overhead costs (expected) $120,000 $80,000

Normal activity (machine hours) 16,000 5,800

A) To calculate the plantwide overhead rate we need to use the following formula:

Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base

Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= (120,000 + 80,000) / (16,000 + 5,800)= $9.17 per machine hour

B) We need to use the same formula, but for each department:

Department A:

Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= 120,000/16,000= $7.5 per machine hour

Department B:

Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= 80,000/5,800= $13.79 per machine hour

7 0

3 years ago

On November 1, 2018, Reid Corporation acquired bonds with a face value of $700,000 for $673,618.61. The bonds carry a stated rat

Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:

Nov 1 2018

Dr Bonds receivable 700,000

Cr Cash 67,3618.61

Cr Discount on bonds receivable 26,381.39

April 3 2019

Dr Cash 35,000

Dr Discount on bonds receivable 2,049.02

Dr Interest revenue 37,059.02

Oct 31, 2019

Dr Cash 35,000

Dr Discount on bonds receivable 2,049.02

Cr Interest revenue 37,059.02

Nov 1, 2019

Dr Cash 700,000

Dr Discount on bonds receivable 22,283.25

Cr Notes receivable 700,000

Cr Profit on sale bonds receivable 22,283.25

Explanation:

Preparation of the journal entries to record the following:

Purchase of the bonds

Interest receipts on April 30, 2019 and October 31, 2019

Sale of the bonds.

Journal entries

Nov 1 2018

Dr Bonds receivable 700,000

Cr Cash 67,3618.61

Cr Discount on bonds receivable 26,381.39

(700,000-67,3618.61)

(To record Purchase of bonds)

April 30 2019

Dr Cash 35,000

(700,000*10%*6/12)

Dr Discount on bonds receivable 2,049.02

(37,059.02-35,000)

Dr Interest revenue 37,059.02

(673,618.61*11%*6/12)

(To record Interest receipts)

Oct 31, 2019

Dr Cash 35,000

Dr Discount on bonds receivable 2,049.02

(37,059.02-35,000)

Cr Interest revenue 37,059.02

(673,618.61*11%*6/12)

(To record Interest receipts)

Nov 1, 2019

Dr Cash 700,000

Dr Discount on bonds receivable 22,283.25

($26,381.39-$2,049.02-$2,049.02)

Cr Notes receivable 700,000

Cr Profit on sale bonds receivable 22,283.25

(To record Sale of the bonds)

8 0

3 years ago